Abstract
This paper considers and rejects the arguments that have been given in favour of the view that one can only act for the reason that p if one knows that p. The paper contrasts it with the view I hold, which is that one can act for the reason that p even if it is not the case that p.
Full Text
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Published version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have