Abstract

Species distribution models (SDMs) are a tool for predicting the eventual geographical range of an emerging pathogen. Most SDMs, however, rely on an assumption of equilibrium with the environment, which an emerging pathogen, by definition, has not reached. To determine if some SDM approaches work better than others for modelling the spread of emerging, non-equilibrium pathogens, we studied time-sensitive predictive performance of SDMs for Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, a devastating infectious fungus of amphibians, using multiple methods trained on time-incremented subsets of the available data. We split our data into timeline-based training and testing sets, and evaluated models on each set using standard performance criteria, including AUC, kappa, false negative rate and the Boyce index. Of eight models examined, we found that boosted regression trees and random forests performed best, closely followed by MaxEnt. As expected, predictive performance generally improved with the length of time series used for model training. These results provide information on how quickly the potential extent of an emerging disease may be determined, and identify which modelling frameworks are likely to provide useful information during the early phases of pathogen expansion.

Highlights

  • Species distribution models (SDMs) are commonly used to predict the geographical range a species can occupy, based on environmental factors at locations where the species has been collected [1,2,3]

  • The need to address the impacts of climate change and invasive species has resulted in regular application of these models to geographical areas outside the region used for model

  • In the random split and the 10-fold cross-validation, random forests (RF) and boosted regression trees (BRT) performed significantly better than the others on AUC and kappa, with nearly indistinguishable evaluation statistics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Species distribution models (SDMs) are commonly used to predict the geographical range a species can occupy, based on environmental factors at locations where the species has been collected [1,2,3]. These predictions are valuable in many contexts, such as deciding where to sample for a species or assessing a species’ potential to expand its range [2,3,4]. The most urgent question is where they will spread

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.