Abstract

ObjectivesThe mode of delivery in podalic presentation was controvertible since the 2000s, which led to a high rate of caesarean section. In our center, the delivery mode was physician-dependent before 2012. Since 2012, the management of podalic presentations was supervised by a protocol allowing a collegiate management to promote vaginal delivery. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of this policy on neonatal outcomes and obstetric practices. MethodsA retrospective study was carried out with comparison of 135 patients who gave birth in 2008 with 110 patients who gave birth in 2014, before and after the implementation of the protocol in a type III university maternity hospital. Two hundred and forty-five singleton pregnancies with podalic presentation and a gestational age more than 32 weeks of gestation were included in this study. The rate of vaginal delivery trial, the evolution of clinical practices and neonatal outcomes were respectively compared. ResultsOne hundred and twenty-six patients who gave birth in 2008 were compared to the 105 one of 2014. The rate of successful vaginal birth trial increased from 32.7% (n=16/49) to 63.8% (n=37/58) (P>0.05) between the two periods, this induced a decrease of 16.3% of planned caesarean sections rate [(77/126) versus (47/105) (P<0.02)] and of 6.2% of emergency caesarean sections rate [(33/126) versus (21/105) (P<0.001)]. No significant difference was observed regarding neonatal outcomes. ConclusionsThis work shows that it is possible to limit the rate of planned and emergency caesarean sections because of an incentive policy of service without impact on neonatal morbidity and mortality.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.