Abstract
PurposeTo evaluate deep learning-reconstructed (DLR)–fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images generated from undersampled data, compare them with fully sampled and rapidly acquired FLAIR images, and assess their potential for white matter hyperintensity evaluation.Materials and methodsWe examined 30 patients with white matter hyperintensities, obtaining fully sampled FLAIR images (standard FLAIR, std-FLAIR). We created accelerated FLAIR (acc-FLAIR) images using one-third of the fully sampled data and applied deep learning to generate DLR–FLAIR images. Three neuroradiologists assessed the quality (amount of noise and gray/white matter contrast) in all three image types. The reproducibility of hyperintensities was evaluated by comparing a subset of 100 hyperintensities in acc-FLAIR and DLR–FLAIR images with those in the std-FLAIR images. Quantitatively, similarities and errors of the entire image and the focused regions on white matter hyperintensities in acc-FLAIR and DLR–FLAIR images were measured against std-FLAIR images using structural similarity index measure (SSIM), regional SSIM, normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), and regional NRMSE values.ResultsAll three neuroradiologists evaluated DLR–FLAIR as having significantly less noise and higher image quality scores compared with std-FLAIR and acc-FLAIR (p < 0.001). All three neuroradiologists assigned significantly higher frontal lobe gray/white matter visibility scores for DLR–FLAIR than for acc-FLAIR (p < 0.001); two neuroradiologists attributed significantly higher scores for DLR–FLAIR than for std-FLAIR (p < 0.05). Regarding white matter hyperintensities, all three neuroradiologists significantly preferred DLR–FLAIR (p < 0.0001). DLR–FLAIR exhibited higher similarity to std-FLAIR in terms of visibility of the hyperintensities, with 97% of the hyperintensities rated as nearly identical or equivalent. Quantitatively, DLR–FLAIR demonstrated significantly higher SSIM and regional SSIM values than acc-FLAIR, with significantly lower NRMSE and regional NRMSE values (p < 0.0001).ConclusionsDLR–FLAIR can reduce scan time and generate images of similar quality to std-FLAIR in patients with white matter hyperintensities. Therefore, DLR–FLAIR may serve as an effective method in traditional magnetic resonance imaging protocols.
Highlights
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used in medical diagnostics and currently serves as the gold standard for investigating most central nervous system disorders
deep learning-reconstructed (DLR)–fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) showed significantly higher structural similarity index measure (SSIM) and lower normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) values compared to acc-FLAIR
Regional SSIM values for white matter hyperintensity areas were high for both DLR–FLAIR and acc-FLAIR, despite the clear visual differences
Summary
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used in medical diagnostics and currently serves as the gold standard for investigating most central nervous system disorders. FLAIR imaging, which employs an inversion recovery technique for water signal suppression, inherently results in a lower signal-to-noise ratio, thereby lengthening acquisition time and rendering the sequence more susceptible to subject motion; this may increase noise and artifacts, potentially compromising diagnostic accuracy [3]. Compressed sensing has emerged as a promising approach for accelerating MRI acquisition by exploiting sparsity in image representations and employing iterative reconstruction algorithms [6–8]. Despite these advancements, challenges remain, including signal-to-noise ratio losses associated with high acceleration factors (AFs) in PI techniques and the computational intensity of iterative compressed sensing algorithms, especially for high-resolution images [9, 10]
Paper version not known (
Free)
Published Version
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have