Abstract

Abstract Adenomatous Polyposis Coli (APC) is a multi-domain tumor suppressor with multiple binding partners, including β-catenin, axin, and microtubules. APC is lost in many epithelial cancers, including up to 70% of sporadic breast cancers, with a tendency towards triple negative breast cancers (TNBCs). We previously demonstrated that APC knockdown in the human TNBC cell line, MDA-MB-157, resulted in resistance to Paclitaxel (PTX), a chemotherapeutic agent of the Taxane family that inhibits mitotic progression. Further studies have confirmed this finding in the MDA-MB-231 cells with CRISPR-mediated APC knockout. To understand the mechanism(s) by which APC controls response to PTX, we have taken two approaches. We first performed an unbiased analysis of transcriptomic changes downstream of APC loss to identify potential therapeutic targets to overcome PTX resistance. In this, a group of transcripts involved in regulation of the cell cycle were identified, including LBH, GLI1, RGS4, and NUPR1. These results have been validated by qRT-PCR and western blot, leading to studies in the laboratory to investigate their specific effects on the response to PTX in breast cancer. Along with the broad exploration studies, molecular studies have focused on whether APC controls expression of cell cycle proteins, leading to PTX resistance. While we observed changes in multiple cell cycle proteins, our focus was on the G2/M transition, given that both PTX and APC impact microtubule dynamics and the G2/M phase of the cell cycle. We examined the effect of APC loss on expression of G2/M proteins, identifying a significant upregulation of CDK1 in APCKD cells. Despite no changes in phosphorylation status of CDK1, we found that Cyclin B1 and CDK1 are only complexed in the APCKD cells, suggesting increased activation. Further studies showed that while the majority of CDK1 and Cyclin B1 are localized to the cytoplasm, there is a small amount in the nucleus. Based on these findings, we sought to investigate whether PTX sensitivity would be altered in response to CDK1 inhibitor, RO-3306. We have shown that PTX resistant APCKD cells are more sensitive (IC50 = 25.5uM) to RO-3306 compared the parental control (IC50 = 78uM). Future studies will use combination and sequential treatments to monitor PTX response in vitro and in vivo. Combined, these studies are elucidating the mechanisms by which loss of APC controls sensitivity to PTX in TNBC, with the long-term goal of designing treatment regimens to improve patient health and survival. Citation Format: Jeni Prosperi, Emily Astarita, Camden Hoover, Sara Maloney. Apc control of taxane resistance in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS16-21.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.