Abstract PR517

Abstract

Background & Objectives: Both single-shot and continuous adductor canal blocks (ACB) have shown promise in reducing postoperative pain in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. In this prospective, randomized and placebo-controlled study, we compared analgesic efficacy, when given as a single-shot vs. continuous technique with intermittent boluses during the postoperative period. Materials & Methods: 75 patients presenting for primary unilateral TKA received preoperatively an ultrasound-guided single-shot ACB and indwelled postoperatively an adductor canal catheter. Those patients were randomly received: a preoperative single-shot of ropivacaine 0.5%, 20ml following intermittent saline boluses at 12h and 24h postoperatively (S-ACB group), or ropivacaine 0.5%, 20ml preoperatively, 12h and 24h postoperatively (C-ACB group), or saline preoperatively and postoperatively (control group). The primary outcome was pain with movement on postoperative Day1 and Day2. Other endpoints included static pain scores, quadriceps muscle strength, rescue opioid consumption, cost incurred and patient satisfaction. Results: Both ACB techniques were equally effective in diminishing dynamic pain and reducing the side effects normally associated with Pethidine Hydrochloride. Dynamic pain scores of the two ACB groups were lower than those of the control group (S-ACB, C-ACB vs. Control group, 4.0, 3.0 vs. 5.0, p < 0.025). Two ACB groups were less likely to use opioids on the first two days after surgery than control (S-ACB vs. C-ACB and control groups, 25.8%, 17%, and 60%, P< 0.05). However, patients receiving a continuous block experienced less quadriceps muscle strength (S-ACB vs. C-ACB group, 4[4,5] vs. 4[3,4], 4[4,5] vs. 4[4,4], respectively, P< 0.05). Time consumption for a single-shot ACB was 4.0 (1.4) min, which is sharply shorter than those for indwelling an adductor canal catheter (20.0 (5.0) min, P = 0). In addition, there was an extra 80 dollars spent for each adductor canal catheter. Patients receiving a single block experienced more satisfied with their pain-relief treatment (S-ACB vs. C-ACB and control groups, 92% vs. 74% and 60%, P < 0.05). Conclusion: Considering the similar analgesic effect, better quadriceps muscle strength, easier operation and higher patient satisfaction the single-shot ACB might be more suitable for TKA patients. Disclosure of Interest: None declared