Abstract P472: Characterization of Infarct Growth Rate Patterns in Patients With Large-Vessel Occlusion Stroke Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy

Abstract

Introduction: Infarct growth is affected by the collateral blood supply and ischemic tolerance and thus unlikely linear. This study aimed to better characterize infarct growth rates (IGR) after large-vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke. Methods: We retrospectively identified patients with anterior LVO stroke who underwent mechanical thrombectomy (MT) at two comprehensive stroke centers. Core infarct volumes at presentation (CBF<30%) were estimated using RAPID software. Final infarct volume (FIV) was measured on post-MT MRI. We estimated IGR during two intervals: IGR 1 defined as CBF<30% (ml) / Time from onset to CTP (hours); and IGR 2 as [FIV - CBF<30% (ml)] / Time from CTP to reperfusion (hours). To calculate IGR 2, we only analyzed patients with successful MT (mTICI ≥ 2b) assuming no significant infarct growth after reperfusion. Functional outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days. We performed the Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for each interval to best classify patients into slow and fast progressors. Results: Of the 361 patients (age 68 ± 15, 55% female, NIHSS 14 ± 6) included in the analysis, 282 (78.1%) had successful reperfusion, and 150 (41.6%) achieved a good outcome (mRS ≤2). IGR showed an exponential growth pattern (Figure 1). There was no significant difference in the median IGR 1 between the poor and good outcome groups (2.3 vs. 1 ml, p=0.061). The median IGR 2 in patients with poor outcome was significantly higher when compared to those in the good outcome group (IGR 14.1ml/h vs. 4.62ml/h, p<0.0001). IGR 2 ≥ 12.2ml/h had a sensitivity of 0.56 and a specificity of 0.77 (AUC 0.67) for predicting poor outcome. Conclusions: We identified an exponential infarct growth pattern after LVO stroke that differs in relation to outcome. High IGR in the interval from CTP to reperfusion is associated with worse outcomes, emphasizing the importance of future research into therapeutic approaches to slow down infarct progression.