Abstract 4358782: Redefining Cardiotoxicity Surveillance in Targeted Immunotherapy: Cytokine Release Syndrome as a High-Yield Trigger for Detecting Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiac Dysfunction After CAR-T Therapy

Title: Association of CAR-T product type with incidence of cancer Therapy–Related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD)

Acute Kidney Injury After the CAR-T Therapy Tisagenlecleucel

Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) Is Not Required for CAR-T Cell Efficacy in Aggressive Large B-NHL

Early Cytopenias and Infections Following Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy: A Single Center Experience

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells: Toxicity and Management Considerations

CAR T-cell therapy for solid tumours

Evaluating Hematologist's Knowledge of CAR T-Cell Therapy in Hematologic Malignancies

Introduction As Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy gains its clinical advantage in the management of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), accumulating evidence shows that it often accompanies cardiac dysfunction. Previous retrospective studies indicated the potential involvement of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in cardiac dysfunction after CAR-T therapy, but no prospective study has reported the time course of cardiac dysfunction. Moreover, the relationship between the severity of CRS and cardiac dysfunction after CAR-T therapy remains unclear. Purpose The objectives of this study are to prospectively examine the sequential changes in cardiac markers overtime after CAR-T therapy and to clarify the association between the grade of CRS and cardiac markers. Methods In this prospective observational study, 30 DLBCL patients who underwent CAR-T therapy from July 2020 to March 2022 were enrolled. Before and after the treatment, the level of cardiac biomarkers and echocardiographic index were sequentially collected. We classified all patients into two groups according to the severity of CRS after CAR-T therapy, namely low-CRS group (CRS <2) and high-CRS group (CRS ≥2). Cardiac biomarkers and echocardiographic parameters were further analyzed in both groups. Results The average age of participants was 59.6 years, and 9 patients (30%) were female. The average duration of DLBCL was 2.7 years. The CRS showed its peak severity on day 3. The number of patients in low- and high-CRS group was 13 and 17, respectively and tocilizumab was administrated for 46% and 71% of the patients in low- and high-CRS group, respectively. At the baseline before CAR-T therapy, there were no significant differences in cardiac parameters between the two groups. During the follow-up, sequential measurements of cardiac biomarkers revealed that high-CRS group showed significantly higher NT-proBNP level compared to that of low-CRS group (NT-proBNP; 90pg/ml vs. 623pg/ml, p=0.0001, respectively) and both had their peak on day 3, whereas troponin T level did not show any differences. Likewise, sequential measurements of echocardiographic parameters revealed that high-CRS group showed significantly increased E/A compared to low-CRS group on day 7 (E/A; 0.77 vs. 0.90, p=0.021, respectively), but not in the later phase. The parameters for systolic function including GLS and EF and parameters for diastolic function such as E/e' and LAVI did not alter among the two groups throughout the follow-up. Conclusion In the patients who underwent CAR-T therapy for DLBCL, the elevation of NT-proBNP level and increase in E/A was transiently observed within a week and correlated with the severity of CRS. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has been confirmed to benefit patients with relapsed and/or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). It is important to provide precise and timely predictions of the efficacy and toxicity of CAR T-cell therapy. In this study, we evaluated the value of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F]FDG PET/CT) combining with clinical indices and laboratory indicators in predicting outcomes and toxicity of anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for DLBCL patients. Thirty-eight DLBCL patients who received CAR T-cell therapy and underwent [18F]FDG PET/CT within 3 months before (pre-infusion) and 1 month after CAR T-cell infusion (M1) were retrospectively reviewed and regularly followed up. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), clinical indices, and laboratory indicators were recorded at pre-infusion and M1 time points, and changes in these indices were calculated. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were as endpoints. Based on the multivariate Cox regression analysis, two predictive models for PFS and OS were developed and evaluated the efficiency. Pre-infusion indices were subjected to predict the grade of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) resulting from toxic reactions. For survival analysis at a median follow-up time of 18.2 months, patients with values of international prognostic index (IPI), SUVmax at M1, and TLG at M1 above their optimal thresholds had a shorter PFS (median PFS: 8.1 months [IPI ≥ 2] vs. 26.2 months [IPI < 2], P = 0.025; 3.1 months [SUVmax ≥ 5.69] vs. 26.8 months [SUVmax < 5.69], P < 0.001; and 3.1 months [TLG ≥ 23.79] vs. 26.8 months [TLG < 23.79], P < 0.001). In addition, patients with values of SUVmax at M1 and ∆SUVmax% above their optimal thresholds had a shorter OS (median OS: 12.6 months [SUVmax ≥ 15.93] vs. 'not reached' [SUVmax < 15.93], P < 0.001; 32.5 months [∆SUVmax% ≥ -46.76] vs. 'not reached' [∆SUVmax% < -46.76], P = 0.012). Two novel predictive models for PFS and OS were visualized using nomogram. The calibration analysis and the decision curves demonstrated good performance of the models. Spearman's rank correlation (rs) analysis revealed that the CRS grade correlated strongly with the pre-infusion SUVmax (rs = 0.806, P < 0.001) and moderately with the pre-infusion TLG (rs = 0.534, P < 0.001). Multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that the pre-infusion value of SUVmax correlated with the risk of developing a higher grade of CRS (P < 0.001). In this group of DLBCL patients who underwent CAR T-cell therapy, SUVmax at M1, TLG at M1, and IPI were independent risk factors for PFS, and SUVmax at M1 and ∆SUVmax% for OS. Based on these indicators, two novel predictive models were established and verified the efficiency for evaluating PFS and OS. Moreover, pre-infusion SUVmax correlated with the severity of any subsequent CRS. We conclude that metabolic parameters measured using [18F]FDG PET/CT can identify DLBCL patients who will benefit most from CAR T-cell therapy, and the value before CAR T-cell infusion may predict its toxicity in advance.

Significant Long-Term Benefits of CAR T-Cell Therapy Followed By a Second Allo-HSCT for Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL) Patients Who Relapsed after an Initial Transplant

Pediatric cancer poses a major health challenge globally, especially in low-middle-income countries like Indonesia. The survival rate of pediatric cancer in many high-income countries (HICs) reaches 90%, while it only ranges from 5 to 60% in LMICs. Over 80% of children with cancer live in low-middle-income countries, indicating the urgency to improve the survival rate of pediatric cancer in LMICs [1]. In Indonesia, the prevalence of pediatric cancer was 43.5% in 2020, making it the highest among Southeast Asian countries [2]. According to Dharmais Cancer Hospital (2024), the national cancer referral center for all of Indonesia, the 5-year survival rate of high-risk pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia is only 48.8% (unpublished data).One key factor contributing to the low survival rate of pediatric cancer in Indonesia is the lack of effective therapy options, especially for high-risk and relapsed or refractory patients. Several therapeutic approaches, such as immunotherapy, have been widely used in HICs but are still not very popular in Indonesia. CAR (Chimeric Antigen Receptor) T-cell therapy is one of the most promising immunotherapeutic approaches to treat pediatric cancer. Implementing CAR T Cell therapy in Indonesia offers promising prospects for improving the survival rates of pediatric cancer patients.CAR T cell therapy utilizes the body's immune system to specifically target and eliminate cancer cells. This innovative therapy entails extracting a patient's T cells, genetically modifying them to express chimeric antigen receptors specific to tumor-associated antigens, and then reinfusing them into the patient. Once infused, these engineered T cells recognize and eliminate cancer cells bearing the targeted antigen, thereby offering a highly targeted and potentially curative treatment option [3]. This innovative therapy has demonstrated remarkable success in treating certain hematologic malignancies, including pediatric leukemia. The most extensively studied case in childhood patients involves CAR T cells that target CD19, a B cell surface receptor [4].CAR T cell therapy holds great promise for improving survival rates among pediatric cancer patients in Indonesia. Children with refractory or relapsed leukemia, such as B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), who have exhausted standard treatment options, can benefit from CAR T cell therapy. Most relapsed or refractory pediatric cancer patients in Indonesia do not have effective therapy options to treat the disease. CAR T cell therapy emerges as a novel therapy that can significantly improve the survival of this subset of patients. Numerous studies have documented high remission rates (ranging from 70% to 90%) in adults and children diagnosed with refractory B-ALL [4]. A study by Maude et al. [5] reported high remission rates and durable responses in young adults and children with refractory or relapsed B-ALL treated with CAR T cells. Similarly, Park et al. [6] demonstrated long-term remissions and improved survival in pediatric leukemia patients receiving CAR T cell therapy. Several groups also have observed the persistence of CAR T cells and sustained remission lasting over six months in the majority of patients examined [4]. Efforts have been made to implement CAR T cells in Indonesia. Dharmais Cancer Hospital, as a National Cancer Center in Indonesia, has initiated this effort by collaborating with iCarTAB Biomed Inc., a China-based CAR T cell manufacturer with one of its manufacturing sites located in Malaysia. However, this approach involves sending patients' blood samples that have been processed through leukapheresis to Malaysia for CAR T cell manufacturing, followed by the shipment of the manufactured cells back to Indonesia for administration to patients. This process is impractical and incurs intangible costs such as transportation and cryopreservation, ultimately making it more expensive for patients. Regulatory issues related to the shipment of cells across borders in the region and early preparation of patients for CAR T cell therapy soon after relapse before they succumb to treatment-related mortality or relapse-related complications are also challenges that need to be addressed [7]. Reflecting on the abovementioned issue, CAR T cell therapy adoption in Indonesia faces significant challenges. Limited healthcare infrastructure, including specialized facilities for cell therapy manufacturing and administration, poses logistical hurdles. Moreover, cost remains a major barrier, as CAR T cell therapy is often expensive and inaccessible to many patients in Indonesia. Furthermore, the lack of local expertise in cellular immunotherapy may impede the successful implementation of CAR T cell therapy programs.Efforts to address these challenges and maximize the potential of CAR T cell therapy in Indonesia are essential. This requires a multi-faceted approach involving investment in healthcare infrastructure, including establishing specialized centers equipped for CAR T cell therapy manufacturing and administration. Two alternative models have been proposed for manufacturing CAR-T cell therapy: centralized and de-centralized models [8]. In the centralized manufacturing model, point of manufacturing and point of care are located in different geographical areas, while decentralized manufacturing focuses on establishing point of care and manufacturing in close proximity. A decentralized manufacturing model might be the best approach to be implemented in LMICs like Indonesia. Building hospital-based cellular therapy manufacturing reduces the need for transportation and cryopreservation. The decentralized system's geographic proximity improves communication between manufacturing and treatment teams, facilitating the creation of customized products based on a patient's phenotype. This setup also reduces administration time and the risk of delays and mix-ups compared to centralized manufacturing, making hospital-based cellular therapy manufacturing a potentially more cost-effective option [8].In addition, initiatives to reduce the cost of therapy through partnerships with pharmaceutical companies, government subsidies, or philanthropic endeavors can improve affordability and access. Furthermore, capacity-building initiatives aimed at training local healthcare professionals in cellular immunotherapy techniques are essential for ensuring the successful implementation and sustainability of CAR T cell therapy programs in Indonesia. Collaboration between local institutions, international organizations, and industry stakeholders can facilitate knowledge transfer and technology transfer, fostering indigenous expertise in this cutting-edge treatment modality.CAR T cell therapy represents a transformative approach to improving survival rates among pediatric cancer patients in Indonesia. By harnessing the power of immunotherapy, specifically tailored to target cancer cells, CAR T cell therapy offers hope for children with refractory or relapsed leukemia who have limited treatment options. Through continued research, collaboration, and investment in healthcare infrastructure, CAR T cell therapy potentially could greatly improve the prognosis and quality of life for pediatric cancer patients in Indonesia.

Managing CAR T-Cell Toxicity: Impact of Steroid Prophylaxis on Toxicity and Outcomes

Natural Killer-Cell Recovery in Patients Receiving CD19 CAR T-Cell Therapy: Dynamics and Clinical Significance

Autoimmune Outcomes in Patients with Concurrent Autoimmune Disease Receiving CD19 CAR T-Cell Therapy for Lymphoma

Association of Bridging Therapy Utilization with Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-Cell Therapy