Abstract
In this paper, the minimum-variance (MV) method, originally proposed by Singh and Drost (1971) and Willassen (1975) to estimate the permanent income model (PIM), is revised in accordance with Friedman's (1957) assumptions. It is shown that the revised MV estimator of the marginal propensity to consume permanent income (mpc) of the PIM is just the maximum-likelihood (ML) estimator of Kendall and Stuart (1901). Treating the PIM as a restricted factor-analysis model (RFAM) of two indicators and one single common factor and incorporating with Tuekey's (1951) grouping approach, the three-stage iterative estimation method developed by Lin (1978) is suggested as an alternative approach to estimate the PIM. For illustration, estimates of mpc are computed for the data used by Haavelmo (1953). The sensitivity of estimation of mpc to the prior specification of the ratio of the variance of transitory income (error in observable income) to that of transitory consumption (error in observable consumption) ia conducted. ...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.