Abstract

AbstractAimTo synthesize published knowledge on palm–frugivore seed dispersal observations and to test whether broad‐scale differences in geographic coverage, diversity, composition and functional structure of plant–animal interactions emerge between biogeographical regions.LocationNeotropics and Afrotropics.MethodsWe constructed a meta‐network for both regions by aggregating observations of pairwise palm–frugivore interactions from the primary literature. We assessed sampling completeness with accumulation curves and estimated knowledge gaps for individual palm species and geographic units within biogeographical regions. We compared the taxonomic composition as well as structural indices of regional interaction networks and tested whether functional trait matching (i.e., the relationship between palm fruit size and frugivore body size) differs between regions.ResultsA total of 750 unique pairwise interaction records were retrieved from the primary literature covering 340 frugivores and 126 palms. Sampling completeness of frugivore interactions within biogeographical regions and for individual palm species was low (often <50%), geographic coverage limited, and relative knowledge gaps were largest in areas with high palm species richness. Interaction diversity and network modularity was larger in the Neotropics than the Afrotropics. A positive fruit size–body mass relationship (i.e., functional trait matching) was statistically significant in the Afrotropics, but not in the Neotropics.Main conclusionsAvailable data on palm–frugivore interactions suggest major biogeographical differences in ecological networks among regions, even when taking differences in palm species richness into account. The Neotropics showed a larger interaction diversity and more modular network structure than the Afrotropics. Broad‐scale morphological trait matching among plants and frugivores was only observed in the Afrotropics. The lack of a Neotropical trait matching relationship might be driven by the late Quaternary extinctions of mammalian megafauna in this region. Although our work has increased the digital availability of palm–frugivore interaction observations, massive knowledge gaps of interaction diversity remain in the tropics.

Highlights

  • Quantifying knowledge gaps in digitally accessible information is a priority for advancing biodiversity science (Hortal et al, 2015; Meyer, Kreft, Guralnick, & Jetz, 2015)

  • Functional trait analyses between palm fruit size and frugivore body size revealed that large‐scale trait‐matching relationships are only observed in the Afrotropics, indicating that larger palm fruits are dispersed by larger frugivores

  • We found a positive relationship between palm fruit size and frugivore body size in the Afrotropics, suggesting morphological trait matching between these mutualistic partners (Bender et al, 2018)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Quantifying knowledge gaps in digitally accessible information is a priority for advancing biodiversity science (Hortal et al, 2015; Meyer, Kreft, Guralnick, & Jetz, 2015). A considerable—yet underutilized—portion of our current knowledge on species interactions can be found within the published scientific literature (de Almeida & Mikich, 2018; Poelen, Simons, & Mungall, 2014). This information can be extracted from the text, but is usually not readily accessible in a digital format (Skusa, Rüegg, & Köhler, 2005; Thessen & Parr, 2014). Once extracted, such interaction data might provide an avenue for a deeper integration of macroecology and network research, for example by analysing the structure and functional composition of aggregated meta‐networks (de Almeida & Mikich, 2018; Hagen et al, 2012; Kissling & Schleuning, 2015)

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.