A Study of Sustainable Material Management Approach in Taiwan

Outcome of the pesticides peer review meeting on general recurring issues in ecotoxicology

Implementing the Results of Material Flow Analysis

Chronic oral lethal and sub‐lethal toxicities of different binary mixtures of pesticides and contaminants in bees (Apis mellifera, Osmia bicornis and Bombus terrestris)

EFSA Supporting PublicationsVolume 15, Issue 1 1366E Technical reportOpen Access Explanatory note on the selection of forage material suitable for the risk assessment of GM feed of plant origin European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)Search for more papers by this authorMichele Ardizzone, Michele ArdizzoneSearch for more papers by this authorClaudia Paoletti, Claudia PaolettiSearch for more papers by this authorElisabeth Waigmann, Elisabeth WaigmannSearch for more papers by this author European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)Search for more papers by this authorMichele Ardizzone, Michele ArdizzoneSearch for more papers by this authorClaudia Paoletti, Claudia PaolettiSearch for more papers by this authorElisabeth Waigmann, Elisabeth WaigmannSearch for more papers by this author First published: 29 January 2018 https://doi.org/10.2903/sp.efsa.2018.EN-1366Citations: 6 Requestor: EFSA Question number: EFSA-Q-2017-00614 AboutPDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL References Allen VG, Batello C, Berretta EJ, Hodgson J, Kothmann M, Li X, McIvor J, Milne J,. Morris C,. Peeters A and Sanderson M, 2011. An international terminology for grazing lands and grazing animals. Grass and Forage Science, 66, 2– 28. EFSA GMO Panel (EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms), 2011. EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO); Scientific Opinion on Guidance for risk assessment of food and feed from genetically modified plants. EFSA Journal 2011; 9(5):2150, 37 pp. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2150 U Meier (ed.), 2001. Growth stages of mono-and dicotyledonous plants, 2nd edition. BBCH Monograph. Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Bonn, Germany. McDonald P, Edwards RA, Greenhalgh JFD, Morgan CA, Sinclair LA, Wilkinson RG, 7th ed., 2011. Animal Nutrition,. Pearson education limited. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2002a. Consensus document on compositional considerations for new varieties of sugar beet: key food and feed nutrients and anti-nutrients. Series on the Safety of Novel Foods and Feeds, No. 3. ENV/JM/MONO(2002)4 OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2002b. Consensus document on compositional considerations for new varieties of maize (Zea maize): key food and feed nutrients, anti-nutrients and secondary plant metabolites. Series on the Safety of Novel Foods and Feeds, No 11. ENV/JM/MONO(2004)16. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2009. Consensus document on compositional considerations for new varieties of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum and Gossypium barbadense): key food and feed nutrients and anti-nutrients. Series on the Safety of Novel Foods and Feeds, No 11. ENV/JM/MONO(2004)16. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2011. Revised consensus document on compositional considerations for new varieties of low erucic acid rapeseed (Canola): key food and feed nutrients, anti-nutrients and toxicants. Series on the Safety of Novel Foods and Feeds, No. 24. ENV/JM/MONO (2011)55. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2012. Revised consensus document on compositional considerations for new varieties of soybean [Glycine max (L.) merr.]: Key food and feed nutrients, anti-nutrients, toxicants and allergens. Series on the Safety of Novel Foods and Feeds, No. 25. ENV/JM/MONO(2012)24 OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2015. Safety assessment of foods and feeds derived from transgenic crops, Volume 1, novel food and feed safety, OECD publishing, Paris. Citing Literature Volume15, Issue1January 20181366E ReferencesRelatedInformation

Using Material Flow Analysis for Sustainable Materials Management

This special issue demonstrates how practical solutions to the development of sustainable cities can be achieved through studying urban metabolism, urban ecology, city carbon and water footprints, the dynamics of city growth, and the interdependency between social actors, institutions, and biophysical system flows. than half the world’s people and about 80% of those in developed nations live in cities and urban areas. These vast urban populations consume a majority of the world’s resources, contribute to environmental degradation locally, regionally, and globally; and simultaneously are highly vulnerable to the consequent impacts of such changes (e.g., climate change). Developing environmentally sustainable cities is one of society’s grand challenges in the coming decades. Transformation of infrastructure systems is understood to be key to developing sustainable, resourceefficient cities (Boyle et al. 2010; Sahely et al. 2005). The framework for urban green growth developed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) sees infrastructure, along with innovation and human capital, as being the starting conditions for achieving green jobs, green supply and consumption, and urban attractiveness (Hammer et al. 2011). The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP 2012) identifies five key thematic infrastructure areas for achieving resource efficient cities—building energy efficiency, waste management, sustainable urban transport, water/wastewater, and urban ecosystem management—but stresses that it is integration between sectors and across scales that is most important. Our goal with this special issue on sustainable urban systems is to apply methods of industrial ecology toward the sustainable development of cities, their supporting hinterlands, and the networked infrastructure that connects them. The methods include familiar tools of industrial ecology, such as life cycle assessment (LCA), material flow analysis (MFA), environmental footprinting, and scenario modeling; but there is also an effort to push the interdisciplinary boundaries of in-

Alþjóðastofnanir á borð við Efnahags- og framfarastofnunina (OECD), Sameinuðu þjóðirnar (SÞ), Alþjóðagjaldeyrissjóðinn (AGS) og Alþjóðabankann eru þekktar fyrir að standa að baki útbreiðslu hugmynda, gilda og stefnumála um heim allan. Á 10. áratugnum jókst áhugi fræðimanna á viðfangsefni sem kallað er hér stefnuyfirfærsla (e. policy transfer). Tilraunir fræðimanna fólust m.a. í því að setja ramma utan um nálgunina og skýra af hverju yfirfærsla á sér stað, við hvaða aðstæður, á hvaða stigi o.s.frv. Fátt hefur verið meira rannsakað innan stjórnsýslufræðanna undanfarna áratugi erlendis en viðfangsefnið hefur lítið borið á góma hér á landi. Þrátt fyrir mikinn áhuga á viðfangsefninu alþjóðlega hefur nálgunin verið gagnrýnd þar sem hún er m.a. talin vera of lýsandi og kenningarlega veik. Hafa ekki embættismenn og stjórnmálamenn stolið hugmyndum frá hvor öðrum í aldir? Í ár verður Efnahags- og framfarastofnunin (OECD) 60 ára. Ísland er eitt af stofnaðildarríkjunum og því kominn tími til að rýna þetta langa samstarf sem íslensk stjórnsýsla hefur átt við OECD. Tilgangur þessarar greinar er að fjalla um starfsemi OECD og meta áhrif hennar á íslenska stefnumótun. Í fyrsta hluta greinarinnar er annars vegar fjallað um forvera OECD sem var Efnahagssamvinnustofnun Evrópu (OEEC) og hvernig hún lagði grunninn að því hvernig OECD starfar í dag. Hins vegar er farið ítarlega yfir hlutverk og skipulag OECD og þær áskoranir sem stofnunin hefur staðið frammi fyrir á undanförnum áratugum. Í öðrum hluta er aðferðin stefnuyfirfærsla skoðuð nánar. Aðferðin er skilgreind auk þess sem fjallað er um helstu leikendur. Tilraun er gerð til að ramma inn helstu afbrigði stefnuyfirfærslna og rætt er um sjálfviljuga og þvingaða yfirfærslu. Að lokum er fjallað um þátttöku Íslands á vettvangi OECD. Til að meta að hvaða leyti íslensk stjórnvöld nýta sér afurðir OECD við stefnumótun hér á landi er stuðst við gögn úr árangurskönnunum stofnunarinnar.

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) was established in 1960, succeeding the Organisation for European Economic Co-operation (OEEC). Its mission is to promote sustainable economic growth, employment, and financial stability through cooperation and transparency among member countries. The OECD operates under a soft-law framework, utilizing non-binding instruments such as guidelines and peer reviews to influence policy and promote best practices. It consists of the Council, committees, and the Secretariat, which work iteratively to develop and implement policies. The OECD’s work spans diverse areas including taxation, trade, education, and environmental policies, contributing significantly to global economic integration. Its influence extends beyond its thirty-eight member countries through partnerships, global forums, and the inclusion of non-member countries in its activities. Despite challenges in maintaining relevance, the OECD continues to adapt to emerging global issues, emphasizing consensus-building and evidence-based policy recommendations.

Bibliography

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) is the least written about and least well understood of the global multilateral economic institutions. Paradoxically, leading commentators ceaselessly refer to the centrality of the OECD to contemporary global governance, yet rarely has the organization been the subject of sustained academic scrutiny. For instance, Joseph Nye (2002: 144) argued that the OECD, in collaboration with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Trade Organization (WTO), provides ‘a framework of rules for the global economy’. Similarly, Held et al. (1999: 84) cite the OECD among the ‘key multilateral economic fora’ common to all ‘states in advanced capitalist societies’. Nevertheless, having identified the importance of the OECD, these and many other observers proceed to marginalize the role of the organization preferring instead to focus on the IMF, the World Bank and the WTO. Equally, as the other contributions to this volume testify, book-length accounts of the activities of the WTO, the IMF, the World Bank and other leading institutions such as the Group of 7/8 (G7/8), which now has an entire book series devoted to it, are commonplace. In contrast, apart from a smattering of texts authored by the OECD’s own staff (OECD 1971; Sullivan 1997) and a small literature examining the organization’s role in the global trading system (Blair 1993; Cohn 2002), the last single-authored book written in English by an outsider and focussing exclusively on the OECD’s role in global affairs was published nearly forty years ago (Aubrey 1967; Woodward 2007a). More specialized work detailing the history and evolution of transatlantic governance is largely devoid of references to the OECD. One contributor to Gardner and Stefanova’s collection The New Transatlantic Agenda (2001) asserts that ‘the “OECD world” is, first of all, a transatlantic world’ (May 2001: 185) but there is only one further reference to the organization in the volume. Pollack and Shaffer’s (2001) Transatlantic Governance in the Global Economy and Richard Cooper’s (1968) classic study of economic management among the Atlantic community, The Economics of Interdependence, provide greater coverage of the OECD and its predecessor the Organization for European Economic Cooperation (OEEC) but again these references are sporadic and fragmented. A cursory survey of articles published in the last decade by what, according to the ISI Social Sciences Citation Index, are thetwenty highest impact international relations journals reveals a comparable pattern (see Table 3.1). In purely quantitative terms the OECD does not fair too badly. The WTO is clearly the frontrunner, being the subject of 211 articles during the period, but the OECD with thirty-four articles is only slightly behind the IMF (48) and is ahead of the World Bank (26) and the G7/8 (5). However, only 15 of these 34 articles contain substantive material about the organization, its work or its broader contribution to global governance. The remaining articles were using OECD countries as a basis for comparison. Finally, the OECD lacks the public profile associated with other international organizations. Anti-globalization protests have marred OECD gatherings in Paris (February 1998), Bologna (June 2000) and Naples (March 2001) but typically OECD meetings are low-key affairs passing off without the media comment, sabre rattling and general razzmatazz that accompany the IMF, WTO and the G8.

SummaryThis article describes a decision support framework for the evaluation of scenarios for the integrated management of municipal solid waste within a local government area (LGA).The work is initially focused on local government (i.e., municipal councils) in the state of Queensland, Australia; however, it is broadly applicable to LGAs anywhere. The goal is to achieve sustainable waste management practices by balancing global and regional environmental impacts, social impacts at the local community level, and economic impacts. The framework integrates life‐cycle assessment (LCA) with other environmental, social, and economic tools. For this study, social and economic impacts are assumed to be similar across developed countries of the world. LCA was streamlined at both the life‐cycle inventory and life‐cycle impact assessment stages.For this process, spatial resolution is introduced into the LCA process to account for impacts occurring at the local and regional levels. This has been done by considering social impacts on the local community and by use of a regional procedure for LCA data for emissions to the environment that may have impacts at the regional level.The integration follows the structured approach of the pressure‐state‐response (PSR) model suggested by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). This PSR model has been extended to encompass nonenvironmental issues and to guide the process of applying multiple tools.The framework primarily focuses on decision analysis and interpretation processes. Multiattribute utility theory (MAUT) is used to assist with the integration of qualitative and quantitative information. MAUT provides a well‐structured approach to information assessment and facilitates objective, transparent decisions. A commercially available decision analysis software package based on MAUT has been used as the platform for the framework developed in this study.

Bibliography

How affordable is health care in the United States and other countries?

Modification of the current MRLs for acetamiprid in flowering brassica and figs

The article examines administrative law practices at the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and is being published as part of an issue of Law & Contemporary Problems on global administrative law. While the OECD is neither a well-known nor well-studied international organization (I worked there from 1990-1992), a number of its activities influence domestic agency action far more than is generally realized. It also provides a wonderful example for the study of global administrative law for the simple reason that it is a hybrid organization. Through its many diverse activities, OECD shares aspects of primarily law-making international bodies such as the EU, primarily standard-setting bodies such as the World Health Organization, and primarily data gathering and research organizations such as the UN Conference on Trade and Development. Perhaps surprisingly, there is no uniform administrative law in the OECD. In managing this constellation of activities, the OECD has chosen largely to decentralize its administrative law down to its subject-specific directorates who develop administrative procedures on an ad hoc basis. Thus in studying administrative law at the OECD, one is effectively studying multiple administrative law systems under one roof. Because the OECD does not garner much attention from scholars or the public, The article commences with a description of the OECD, out the basics of the organization's origins, operations, and examples of its range of activities. Four case studies then examine the OECD's multiple roles and how these bear on the development of the organization's administrative law. The cases range from traditional treaty-making, to consensus development of standards, to quasi-judicial review of the actions of multinational enterprises. Each of these examples relies on different types of administrative mechanisms to address the core concerns of transparency, responsiveness and accountability. The final section explores whether administrative law safeguards should apply to OECD activities that, while not lawmaking themselves, exert important influence on domestic lawmaking and underscores why the OECD has adopted a decentralized model of administrative law.