Abstract
AbstractTo assess whether subjects who report experiences of being ‘hypnotized’ are prone to attribution errors, 60 subjects were presented with a monotonous tape of numbers from which some numbers were missing, and a standard measure of hypnotic depth. Results indicated that subjects who reported themselves ‘hypnotized’ by the monotonous tape were more likely to misattribute the missing numbers to hypnosis, and report higher levels of hypnotic depth. However, depth reports given in the context of a formal hypnotic induction procedure were unrelated to the tendency to misat‐tribute the missing numbers to hypnosis. Copyright © 1996 British Society of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
