Abstract
The European Court of Justice has developed a body of jurisprudence that regulates issues such as access, capacity, quality, student allowances and labour market needs, and that should be considered at least an even more important contribution to the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) than the Bologna process. The Bressol and Chaverot cases prove that the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) takes national policy demands seriously, without agreeing to many restrictions on the liberty of students to study abroad. Nevertheless, Member States could limit access for reasons of public health, whereas financial reasons seem not a valid excuse for direct or indirect discrimination. Many of those involved in the Bologna Process may be surprised by the work already done by the ECJ. Yet, the genuine involvement of all Member States is crucial for making the EHEA into a lasting success, as today's question is: Is the EHEA at risk and do rulings like those of the Constitutional Court of Belgium (CCB) contribute to this?
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
