Abstract
This study was undertaken to ascertain whether the use of a valved holding chamber (VHC) during bronchial provocation testing might increase lung deposition and repeatability of the test relative to the tidal breathing method. The 2-min tidal breathing results were compared to five inhalations from a VHC device in patients using the Pari-provoII nebulizer (MMD = 2.1mkm). Lung and mouth deposition, losses though the exhaled air and losses before aerosol delivery to the patient's mouth were measured in patients using a radiolabeled 99Tc-DTPA solution and gamma camera. The study revealed that lung deposition was 67% with the VHC method, and losses with exhaled air were 29% of the inhaled amount. The tidal breathing method resulted in lung deposition of 20.9 +/- 3.4%, and losses with exhaled air were 77.5 +/-3.5%. Mouth deposition did not differ significantly between methods. Variability in lung deposition was 15.3% for the VHC and 32.0% for the tidal breathing method. In addition to greater lung deposition and reproducibility, the VHC method allows easier calculation of the inhaled dose.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
