Abstract

Context. The stellar density profile of a galaxy is typically summarised with two numbers: the total stellar mass and half-light radius. The total mass of a galaxy, however, is not a well-defined quantity, due to the finite depth of photometric observations and the arbitrariness of the distinction between galaxy and diffuse intra-group light. This limits our ability to make accurate comparisons between models and observations. Aims. I wish to provide a more robust two-parameter description of the stellar density distribution of elliptical galaxies, in terms of quantities that can be measured unambiguously. Methods. I propose using the stellar mass enclosed within 10 kpc in projection, M*,10, and the mass-weighted stellar density slope within the same aperture, Γ*,10, for this purpose. I measured the distribution in M*,10 and Γ*,10 of a sample of elliptical galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and the Galaxy And Mass Assembly survey, using photometry from the Hyper Suprime-Cam survey. I measured, at fixed (M*,10, Γ*,10), what the spread is in the galaxy surface brightness profile and central stellar velocity dispersion within the sample. As a first application, I then compared the observed M*,10 − Γ*,10 relation of elliptical galaxies with that of similarly selected galaxies in the EAGLE REFERENCE simulation. Results. The pair of values of (M*,10, Γ*,10) can be used to predict the stellar density profile in the inner 10 kpc of a galaxy with better than 20% accuracy. Similarly, M*,10 and Γ*,10 can be combined to obtain a proxy for stellar velocity dispersion that is at least as good as the stellar mass fundamental plane. The average stellar density slope of EAGLE elliptical galaxies matches that of observed ones at M*,10 = 1011 M⊙ well, but the EAGLE M*,10 − Γ*,10 relation is shallower and has a larger intrinsic scatter compared to observations. Conclusions. This new parameterisation of the stellar density profile of massive elliptical galaxies provides a more robust way of comparing results from different photometric surveys and from hydrodynamical simulations, with respect to a description based on total stellar mass and half-light radius.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.