Abstract
The purpose of this article is to carry out two major tasks. The first is to discuss Grohmann (2003)s containment-based Anti-Locality Condition from a critical point of view and test its coverage of empirical application on the basis of A-movement and A-movement. It will be shown that the Anti-Locality Condition has a very limited coverage of application in comparison with other containment-based locality conditions such as the Phase Impenetrability Condition. The second is to offer a revised version of the Anti-Locality Condition to broaden its coverage of application. The revised version of the Anti-Locality Condition will be a genuine solution of the problems that the standard Anti-Locality Condition is confronted with.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
