A review of membrane processes and renewable energies for desalination

Desalination is being used on a much larger scale as a result of the rising scarcity of freshwater. Desalination plant energy usage, however, continues to be a problem. Inherently appealing, the use of renewable energy sources has been the subject of numerous research. Membrane processes are indeed attracting a great deal of interest due to their economic viability and capacity to be scaled up. This article offers a cutting-edge review of membrane processes related to renewable energies for desalinating seawater and brackish water. Reverse osmosis, membrane distillation, and electrodialysis are examples of membrane processes. They are combined with renewable energies like hydrostatic pressure, waves, solar, wind, and wind. The key findings in this field include principles, plant design and implementation, mathematical models, and economic viability, are presented in this article.

This review aims to succinctly summarize recent advances of four key membrane processes (e.g., reverse osmosis (RO), forward osmosis (FO), electrodialysis (ED), and membrane distillation (MD)) in membrane materials and process designs, to elucidate the contributions of these advances to the steadfast growth of brackish water membrane desalination processes. With detailed analyses and discussions, the ultimate purpose of the review is to shed light on the future direction of brackish water desalination using membrane processes. Brackish water has widely varying particulate matter and boron contents, posing great risks of membrane fouling and excessive boron levels to the membrane desalination processes. Recent advances in these four membrane processes largely focus on improving fouling resistance, boron rejection, water flux, and energy efficiency. Aquaporin membranes and thin-film composite polyamide membranes incorporated with nanoparticles exhibit excellent performances for RO and FO, whereas super-hydrophobic membranes prove their great potentials for MD. While recent advances in RO and ED process designs are orientated towards membrane fouling prevention by exploring respectively novel energy-saving membrane-based pre-treatment and reversal operation, recent studies on FO and MD are centered on reducing the energy costs by advancing the fertilizer-drawn concept and utilizing waste heat. Membrane processes are dominating brackish water desalination, and this trend is hardly to change. Membranes based on nanoparticles and other novel materials are deemed the next membrane generation, and innovative membrane process designs have demonstrated great potentials for brackish water desalination. Nevertheless, further works are needed to scale up these novel membrane materials and designs.

Progress and prospects in reverse electrodialysis for salinity gradient energy conversion and storage

SARS-CoV-2 has aroused drastic effects on the global economy and public health. In response to this, personal protective equipment, hand hygiene, and social distancing have been considered the most important ways to prevent the direct spread of the virus. SARS-CoV-2 would be possible survive in wastewater for a few days, leading to secondary transmission via contact with water and wastewater. Thus, the most economical and practical approaches for decentralized wastewater treatment are renewable energies such as the solar energy disinfestation process. However, as freshwater requirements increase and fossil fuels become unsustainable, renewable energy becomes more attractive for desalination applications. Solar photovoltaic, membrane-based, and electricity desalination technologies are becoming increasingly popular due to their lower energy requirements. Several aquatic environments could be benefitted from solar energy wastewater disinfection. Besides, utilizing solar energy during the day can inactivate SARS-CoV-2 to nearly 90%. However, conventional membrane-based desalination practices have also been integrated, including reverse osmosis (RO) and electrodialysis (ED). Several exciting membrane processes have been developed recently, including membrane distillation (MD), pressure-reduced osmosis (PRO), and reverse electrodialysis (RED). Such operations can produce clean and sustainable electricity from brine and impaired water, generally considered hazardous to the environment. As a result, neither PRO nor RED can produce electricity without mixing a high salinity solution (such as seawater or brine and wastewater, respectively) with a low salinity solution. Herein, we critically review the progress in applying renewable energy such as solar energy and geothermal energy for generating electricity from wastewater treatment and uniquely discuss the effects of these two types of renewable energy on SARS-CoV-2 in air and wastewater treatment. We also highlight the significant process made on the membrane processes utilizing renewable energy and research gaps from the standpoint of producing clean and sustainable energy. The significant points of this review are: (1) among various types of renewable energy, solar energy and geothermal energy have been predominantly studied for wastewater treatment, (2) effects of these two types of renewable energy on SARS-CoV-2 in air and wastewater treatment are critically analyzed, and (3) the knowledge gaps and anticipated future research outlook have been consequently proposed thereof.

Water is one of the earth's most abundant resources, covering about three-quarters of the planet's surface. Yet, there is an acute shortage of potable water in many countries, especially in Africa and the Middle East region. The reason for this apparent contradiction is, of course, that ∼97.5% of the earth's water is salt water in the oceans and only 2.5% is fresh water in ground water, lakes and rivers and this supplies most human and animal needs. Tackling the water scarcity problem must involve better and more economic ways of desalinating seawater. This article presents a comprehensive review of water desalination systems, whether operated by conventional energy or renewable energy, to convert saline water into fresh water. These systems comprise the thermal phase change and membrane processes, in addition to some alternative processes. Thermal processes include the multistage flash, multiple effects boiling and vapour compression, cogeneration and solar distillation, while the membrane processes include reverse osmosis, electrodialysis and membrane distillation. It also covers the integration into desalination systems of potential renewable energy resources, including solar energy, wind and geothermal energy. Such systems are increasingly attractive in the Middle East and Africa, areas suffering from shortages of fresh water but where solar energy is plentiful and where operational and maintenance costs are low. The advantages and disadvantages, including the economic and environmental aspects, of these desalination systems are presented.

Seawater desalination using renewable energy sources

Seawater and brackish water desalination has been a practical approach to mitigating the global fresh water scarcity. Current large-scale desalination installations worldwide can complementarily augment the global fresh water supplies, and their capacities are steadily increasing year-on-year. Despite substantial technological advance, desalination processes are deemed energy-intensive and considerable sources of CO2 emission, leading to the urgent need for innovative low carbon desalination platforms. This paper provides a comprehensive review on innovations in membrane processes and membrane materials for low carbon desalination. In this paper, working principles, intrinsic attributes, technical challenges, and recent advances in membrane materials of the membrane-based desalination processes, exclusively including commercialised reverse osmosis (RO) and emerging forward osmosis (FO), membrane distillation (MD), electrodialysis (ED), and capacitive deionisation (CDI), are thoroughly analysed to shed light on the prospect of low carbon desalination.

Both brackish water desalination and seawater desalination processes are well established and in common use around the globe to create new water supply sources. The farther the location of the source water from the ocean or seashore, the lower the salinity (TDS) of the water and the lower the osmotic pressure that needs to be overcome when desalinated water is produced. This is one of the major reasons that brackish desalination is often considered less costly than seawater desalination. A number of project considerations, however, indicate that seawater desalination can be beneficial and more cost-effective than brackish water desalination. To make a fair comparison, we need to properly compare all major aspects of both types of projects to define the best and most appropriate desalination technology. While brackish water has less feed water TDS, it is more challenging to dispose of the produced concentrate. Also, although brackish water desalination needs less energy to overcome osmotic pressure, it usually requires more energy to draw the water from the well than it takes to pump seawater from the open ocean intake. Another factor is that the temperature of the brackish well water may be lower than the temperature of ocean water, giving seawater desalination an advantage in energy demand. In comparing brackish to seawater desalination, these major aspects should be evaluated: (1) Locations of seawater and brackish water plants, relative to the major consumers of the desalinated water, (2) Transportation (pumping and disposal) costs of the feed water and produced water, (3) Potential colocation of a seawater plant with a large industrial user (e.g., power plant) of the seawater for cooling or other purposes, (4) Produced quality of brackish water and seawater desalination in terms of major minerals and emerging contaminants, (5) Sustainability of the water source: capacity and depth of the brackish water wells, as well as the type of soil. (6) Technical and economic aspects of produced concentrate disposal, (7) Permitting process costs for brackish and seawater desalination, and (8) The economics of both brackish and seawater desalination treatment processes: capital costs, operational and maintenance (O&M) costs, lifetime water cost, and total water cost (TWC). This paper discusses the major evaluation criteria and considerations involved in properly comparing the economic and technical aspects of brackish and seawater desalination to determine the more favorable desalination technology for a given desalination project.

Polarization phenomena in integrated reverse osmosis and membrane distillation for seawater desalination and waste water treatment

Water is the most common substance in the world, however, 97% is seawater and only 3% is fresh water. The availability of water for human consumption is decreasing due to increasing the environmental pollution. According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), about 2.4 billion people do not have access to basic sanitation facilities, and more than one billion people do not have access to safe drinking water (Singh, 2006). Moreover, the world’s population is expected to rise to nine billion from the current six billion in the next 50 years. Chronic water pollution and growing economies are driving municipalities and companies to consider the desalination as a solution to their water supply problems. Generally, desalination processes can be categorized into two major types: 1) phasechange/thermal and 2) membrane process separation. Some of the phase-change processes include multi-stage flash, multiple effect boiling, vapour compression, freezing and solar stills. The pressure driven membrane processes, such as reverse osmosis (RO), nanofiltration (NF), ultrafiltration (UF) and microfiltration (MF), have found a wide application in water treatment (Charcosset, 2009). The energy required to run desalination plants remains a drawback. The energy limitations of traditional separation processes provided the impetus for the development and the commercialisation of membrane processes. Membrane technologies (simple, homogenous in their basic concepts, flexible in application), might contribute to the solution of most of the existing separation problems. Nowadays, membranes are used for the desalination of seawater and brackish water, potable water production, and for treating industrial effluents. RO membrane separation has been traditionally used for sweater desalination (Charcosset, 2009; Schafer et al., 2005; Singh, 2006). One of the limitations of membrane processes is severe loss of productivity due to concentration polarisation and fouling or scaling (Baker & Dudley, 1998; Schafer et al., 2005). Membrane pretreatment processes are designed to minimise the potential problems of scaling resulting from the precipitation of the slightly soluble ions. Membrane (MF or UF) pretreatment of RO desalinations plants is now a viable options for removing suspended solids, fine particles, colloids, and organic compounds (Banat & Jwaied, 2008; Singh, 2006). NF pretreatment of sweater is also being used to soften RO feed water instead of traditional softening (Schafer et al., 2005). The industrial development of new membrane processes, such as membrane distillation (MD), is now being observed (Banat & Jwaied, 2008; Gryta, 2007). In MD process feed water is heated to increase its vapour pressure, which generates the difference between the partial

Chapter 5 - Design, Energy and Cost Analyses of Membrane Processes

Membrane processes and renewable energies

Chapter 10 - Direct Contact Membrane Distillation

Membrane technology in renewable-energy-driven desalination

Hard-to-abate industries, including steel, cement, and datacenters, are responsible for approximately 30% of global CO2 emissions and present intrinsic challenges for decarbonization due to their reliance on high-temperature heat, continuous processes, and carbon-intensive feedstocks. Achieving the climate goals of the Paris Agreement, requires reducing industrial emissions by up to 90% by 2050, as industrial CO2 could otherwise increase by 12–20% under a business-as-usual scenario. Hydrogen produced via renewable and nuclear energy sources emerges as a pivotal enabler for this transformation: in fact, as energy vector, it allows to overcome both the slow dynamics of nuclear plants and the intermittent and aleatory nature of renewable power plants while it provides a low-carbon, high-energy-density alternative to fossil fuels in energy-intensive processes. In this work, solutions will be presented to decarbonize hard-to-abate industries based on optimal operation and design aimed at costs minimization. The hydrogen value chain requires specialized infrastructure to ensure technical efficiency and economic feasibility. In the production phase, electrolyzers powered by renewable or nuclear energy are coupled with reciprocating or centrifugal compressors and asset performance management (APM) solutions to optimize hydrogen handling and system reliability. Transportation and storage involve centrifugal pumps and expanders to regulate flow and pressure during delivery, while sensor solutions enable continuous leak detection and predictive maintenance. At the utilization stage, hydrogen-fueled gas turbines can deliver high-efficiency, low-carbon power and process heat. Throughout the value chain, advanced Energy Management System (EMS) platforms guarantee the minimization of the Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH). Each component of the value chain is critical, and an integrated optimal approach, one that, using advanced algorithms for operation and design, seamlessly combines all these complex technologies to minimize the costs of the solution, is key to achieve technical viability and economic competitiveness for hydrogen-based infrastructures, enabling scalable decarbonization solutions. To demonstrate the potential of hydrogen-based technologies, integrated solutions suited for real-world applications in hard-to-abate industries are presented. Specifically, this work shows the optimal design of hydrogen-based infrastructures to decarbonize steel factories, combining electrolyzers, battery energy storage systems (BESS), hydrogen compression, storage technologies, renewable energy sources (RES) and hydrogen-fueled gas turbines. The selected optimal mixes provide the most cost-effective plant for different decarbonization targets. These examples highlight how a coordinated, optimal deployment of different technologies can enable effective and scalable decarbonization pathways. The optimal design and operation of hydrogen-based hybrid power plants applied to steel factories represents a new kind of approach, which is paramount to minimize the LCOH. The results underscore the importance of designing hydrogen ecosystems that optimize each phase of the value chain, ensuring sustainability, reliability, and cost-efficiency as we transition to a low-carbon industrial future.