Abstract

The role of the stress measure to be chosen as the argument in the definition of yield functions is discussed in the context of finite strain plasticity theory. Motivated by physical arguments, the exponential algorithm for multiplicative finite strain plasticity is revisited such that Cauchy stresses are adopted as arguments in the yield function. Using logarithmic strain measures, the return map algorithm is formulated in principal axes. The algorithmic tangent moduli are obtained in a slightly modified, unsymmetric format compared to the standard formulation in terms of Kirchhoff stresses. However, the global structure of the exponential algorithm is unchanged. The algorithm is applied to the re-formulation of the Cam—Clay model in terms of Cauchy stresses. The typical calibration procedure of the Cam—Clay model based on Cauchy stresses is demonstrated. As an alternative, a modification of the Cam—Clay model, which allows re-calibration of Cauchy stress-based test data to be used within the framework of a Kirchhoff-based finite strain model is also discussed. The relevance of the adequate choice of the stress measure is illustrated by means of selected numerical analyses.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.