Abstract

The eukaryotic cell division cycle encompasses an ordered series of events. Chromosomal DNA is replicated during S phase of the cell cycle before being distributed to daughter cells in mitosis. Both S phase and mitosis in turn consist of an intricately ordered sequence of molecular events. How cell cycle ordering is achieved, to promote healthy cell proliferation and avert insults on genomic integrity, has been a theme of Paul Nurse's research. To explain a key aspect of cell cycle ordering, sequential S phase and mitosis, Stern & Nurse proposed ‘A quantitative model for cdc2 control of S phase and mitosis in fission yeast’. In this model, S phase and mitosis are ordered by their dependence on increasing levels of cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) activity. Alternative mechanisms for ordering have been proposed that rely on checkpoint controls or on sequential waves of cyclins with distinct substrate specificities. Here, we review these ideas in the light of experimental evidence that has meanwhile accumulated. Quantitative Cdk control emerges as the basis for cell cycle ordering, fine-tuned by cyclin specificity and checkpoints. We propose a molecular explanation for quantitative Cdk control, based on thresholds imposed by Cdk-counteracting phosphatases, and discuss its implications.

Highlights

  • Cell growth and division are the basis for biological life the way we know it

  • CYCLIN SPECIFICITY If not by checkpoints or surveillance mechanisms, how is the ordering of the cell cycle achieved? An important hint came with the discovery of G1 cyclins in budding yeast, Cln1 – Cln3, that are required for entry into the cell cycle at the G1 –S transition [32,33], followed by the identification of distinct budding yeast cyclins required for mitosis, Clb1 – Clb4, more closely related to the previously known metazoan mitotic cyclins [16,34,35]

  • To explain how cell cycle ordering with a single source of cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) activity is possible, Stern & Nurse [6] proposed ‘A quantitative model for the cdc2 control of S phase and mitosis in fission yeast’

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Cell growth and division are the basis for biological life the way we know it. Several chapters in this issue discuss how cell growth and division are regulated so as to fulfil the requirements during birth, development and reproduction of complex multi-cellular organisms, a question of outstanding importance (see the reviews by van Werven & Amon [1], O’Farrell [2] and Kronja & Orr-Weaver [3] in this issue). It has been argued that the increased genome size made it necessary to separate S phase from mitosis This is because DNA replication and chromosome condensation, required to compact large chromosomes, might be mutually exclusive [5,6]. (iii) The quantitative increase of Cdk activity during the cell cycle triggers first S phase at a relatively low level, mitosis as Cdk activity peaks [6,17] We will consider these three models shortly in more detail, together with relevant evidence that has accumulated since they were first proposed. Chromosomes decondense and the spindle disassembles in telophase, before two new daughter cells are pinched off by cytokinesis All of these latter stages of mitosis have been linked to Cdk downregulation, but how their ordering is achieved is poorly understood

CHECKPOINTS OR SURVEILLANCE MECHANISMS
CYCLIN SPECIFICITY
A QUANTITATIVE MODEL FOR ORDERING S PHASE AND MITOSIS
S phase mitosis
CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.