Abstract
Classical mathematical logic includes a lot of “implicational paradoxes” as its logic theorems. This paper uses the property of strong relevance as the criterion to identify implicational paradoxes in logical theorems of classical mathematical logic, and enumerates logical theorem schemata of classical mathematical logic that do not satisfy the strong relevance. This quantitative analysis shows that classical mathematical logic is by far not a suitable logical basis for automated forward deduction.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
