Abstract

BackgroundMany patients with acute stroke do not receive recommended care in tertiary hospital settings. Allied health professionals have important roles within multidisciplinary stroke teams and influence the quality of care patients receive. Studies examining the role of allied health professionals in acute stroke management are scarce, and very little is known about the clinical decision making of these stroke clinicians. In this study we aimed to describe factors that influence the complex clinical decision making of these professionals as they prioritise acute stroke patients for recommended care. This qualitative study was part of a larger mixed methods study.MethodsThe qualitative methodology applied was a constructivist grounded theory approach.Fifteen allied health professionals working with acute stroke patients at three metropolitan tertiary care hospitals in South Australia were purposively sampled.Semi-structured interviews were conducted face to face using a question guide, and digital recording. Interviews were transcribed and analysed by two researchers using rigorous grounded theory processes.ResultsOur analysis highlighted ‘predicted discharge destination’ as a powerful driver of care decisions and clinical prioritisation for this professional group. We found that complex clinical decision making to predict discharge destination required professionals to concurrently consider patient’s pre-stroke status, the nature and severity of their stroke, the course of their recovery and multiple factors from within the healthcare system. The consequences of these decisions had potentially profound consequences for patients and sometimes led to professionals experiencing considerable uncertainty and stress.ConclusionsOur qualitative enquiry provided new insights into the way allied health professionals make important clinical decisions for patients with acute stroke. This is the first known study to demonstrate that the subjective prediction of discharge destination made early in an acute admission by allied health professionals, has a powerful influence over the care and rehabilitation provided, and the ultimate outcomes for stroke patients.

Highlights

  • Many patients with acute stroke do not receive recommended care in tertiary hospital settings

  • As part of a larger mixed methods study, we have published quantitative research that investigated associations between the quality of care acute stroke patients receive from allied health (AH) professionals and various predictor variables including age, gender, stroke severity, Charlson

  • In this study we chose a constructivist grounded theory approach which is recommended when examining poorly understood phenomenon [15]. Using this methodology we explored the perceptions of AH professionals regarding their decision making and the prioritisation of acute stroke patients to receive various assessments, rehabilitation therapy and other elements of recommended care

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many patients with acute stroke do not receive recommended care in tertiary hospital settings. In this study we aimed to describe factors that influence the complex clinical decision making of these professionals as they prioritise acute stroke patients for recommended care. This qualitative study was part of a larger mixed methods study. Quantitative studies have linked the quality of care received by patients with acute stroke to predictor variables such as age [5,6,7] and day of hospital admission [8]. As part of a larger mixed methods study, we have published quantitative research that investigated associations between the quality of care acute stroke patients receive from AH professionals and various predictor variables including age, gender, stroke severity, Charlson

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.