Abstract

Currently, the term “soapstone” often refers to both talc-bearing ultramafic metamorphic rocks and other rocks having a wide range of variation in mineral composition. As a result, the name provides little information on the major mineral constituents in the rock. This proposal for the classification and nomenclature of soapstones is based on the absolute and relative modal mineral compositions. It does not consider textural attributes. According to the International Union of Geological Sciences, Subcommission on the Systematic of Metamorphic Rocks (IUGS-SCMR), rock names should be understood uniquely and without ambiguity. Therefore, we recommend: (1) soapstone has to contain 35–75% talc, (2) soapstone cannot contain more than 35% hard silicates. Further division is made based on the ratios of oxide, chlorite, and carbonate. Finally, the name of the additional hard silicate is considered as a prefix, if its content exceeds 5%.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.