Abstract

8005 Background: Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) remains the most common malignancy in patients with HIV. Outcomes have significantly improved over the last decade, but there is no accepted consensus regarding the optimal initial therapeutic approach. Our objective was to assess the effects of clinical factors on response and survival. Methods: We performed a systematic review to search for prospective clinical phase II or III trials that assessed therapeutic interventions for HIV-associated NHL and assembled individual patient data from 16 trials published between 2000 and 2011 including 1144 patients (median N=62/trial, range 17-195). Treatment factors included type of chemotherapy (CHOP, N=642; EPOCH, N=178; CDE, N=191; intensive regimens, N=155) and rituximab use (N=542). Endpoints included complete response (CR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). We used logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for age, sex, age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (IPI), baseline CD4 count, baseline HIV viral load, use of concurrent antiretroviral therapy, and histology. Odds ratios (OR) > 1 for CR denote improved CR, and hazard ratios (HR) < 1 indicate reduced risk of progression or death. Results: Among the lymphoma- and HIV-specific covariates evaluated, only a higher IPI score was associated with inferior CR rate, PFS and OS (p<0.001). Rituximab was associated with a higher CR rate (OR 1.75; p=0.017), better PFS (HR 0.39, p<0.001) and OS (HR 0.39, p<0.001); patients with a higher baseline CD4 count benefited more from rituximab (HR for OS 0.57 if baseline CD4 count ≥100/ul vs. <100/ul; p<0.001). For all histologies, initial therapy with the EPOCH regimen resulted in a better CR rate (OR 1.78, p=0.039), PFS (HR 0.61, p=0.032) and OS (HR 0.47, p<0.001) when compared to CHOP. Conclusions: In this pooled analysis including 1144 patients with HIV-associated NHL, the addition of rituximab to chemotherapy was associated with significantly improved CR rate, PFS, and OS, specifically for patients with a baseline CD4 count ≥100/uL. Treatment with infusional EPOCH was also more effective than CHOP.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.