Abstract

Quantum Mechanics’ entanglement and probabilistic behaviors are viewed in the light of Quantum Field Theory’s (QFT’s) advances made during the last century. In particular, Bohm’s version (B-EPR) of the Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen (EPR) experiment is now viewed with the aid of QFT’s modern description of electrons. In QFT, free electrons possess a bare core surrounded by a “dressing”. The dressing consists of one or more virtual particles/fields pulled from the vacuum during the bound electron’s parturition. In QFT, a bound electron’s freedom is aided by eliminating its energy losses from bremsstrahlung. The paper develops a “Shimony” numerical model using QFT’s free electron structure with the aid of a “random vector paradigm” (RVP). The RVP simply expresses QFT’s free electron as a bare core surrounded by an EM dressing. Using this RVP, we imbue newly freed electrons with a vector-like EM spin property of 1/2. From this, the Shimony Monte Carlo computer analysis provides a detailed comparison of the B-EPR experiment as described by Bell. The entanglement property can serve to provide a way to transport shared encoded information. Overall, the electron dressing can convey random elements that may provide QM with its entanglement and probabilistic behaviors.

Highlights

  • The background of this research harkens back to the origins of Quantum Mechanics (QM) early in the 20th century

  • Quantum Mechanics’ entanglement and probabilistic behaviors are viewed in the light of Quantum Field Theory’s (QFT’s) advances made during the last century

  • In QFT, free electrons possess a bare core surrounded by a “dressing”

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The background of this research harkens back to the origins of Quantum Mechanics (QM) early in the 20th century. QM’s entanglement and probabilistic attributes arose and scientists were puzzled by its meaning and behaviors Several of the world’s best physical theorists at the time, such as Einstein and Schrodinger, objected to this, as probabilities are usually associated with random events, requiring a source of a random element, such as the use of cards or dice. It was upon hearing of this interpretation, Einstein was reported to have declared “God does not play dice with the Universe”. As a result of the Copenhagen meeting, the theoretical viewpoint moved towards the current probabilistic and entanglement viewpoints with a dearth of physical understanding as to why QM exhibits these novel mannerisms

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.