Abstract
Over the recent years, deep learning is widely being used in a variety of different fields and applications. The constant growth of data used to train complex models, has opened research in the distributed learning. In this domain, two main architectures are used to train models in a distribution fashion, all-reduce and parameter server. Both support synchronous learning, while parameter server also supports asynchronous learning. These architectures are adopted by tech companies, which have developed multiple systems for this purpose. Among the most popular and widely used distributed deep learning systems are Google TensorFlow, Facebook PyTorch and Apache MXNet. In this paper, we quantify the performance gap between these systems and present a detailed analysis to discuss the parameters that affect their execution time. Overall, in synchronous learning setups, TensorFlow is slower compared to PyTorch by average 2.65X, while the latter lags MXNet by average 1.38X. Regarding asynchronous learning, MXNet is faster by average 3.22X in respect with TensorFlow.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
