Abstract

There are three ways of periodising Pacific (or any region’s) history: national, international and transnational. The national way is to deal with each country of the wider Pacific (including East Asia and Southeast Asia) in terms of its own development. Pacific history would then amount to the sum of all national or local histories. But such nationcentric history would belie the very idea of regional history, such as Pacific history, so we may disregard this approach. Of the remaining two, the international approach is the one that is most frequently used to periodise the history of the world and of its regions. That approach has been supplemented, and at times superseded, by a transnational perspective, and this chapter will pay greater attention to it than the more familiar international history framework.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.