Abstract

Precooling technology is one of the promising approaches for expanding the flight envelope of conventional turbine engines and enhancing flight performance at high Mach numbers. Within this domain, a crucial challenge is to rapidly and accurately obtain the flow and heat transfer characteristics of the precooler. Currently, full-size simulation of the precooler is impractical, while simplified and fast simulation methods employed in previous research have exhibited certain deficiencies, including excessive simplification and unconvincing validation. In this study, a novel simplified simulation method for the annular precooler based on the virtual source term model was proposed. This method comprehensively considered the axial and radial non-uniformity of airflow caused by the coupling effect between the precooler and the inlet channel in the actual flow field. Subsequently, systematic validations of the reliability and superiority of this method were conducted, along with its application in the overall performance calculation of the precooled engine. The results demonstrate that the simplified method proposed in this paper showcases higher accuracy than the methods employed in previous research. Compared with the real model, the relative errors of the overall parameters are within ± 1 %, and the relative errors of the distortion indices for total temperature and total pressure are 5.1 % and −1.5 %, respectively. Meanwhile, the number of computational mesh cells is reduced by more than 95 %. Moreover, the first application of the simplified method in the overall performance calculation of the precooled engine reveals that the traditional low-dimensional model underestimates both the total pressure loss of the precooler and the fuel consumption for precooling, resulting in larger calculation deviations in the thrust and equivalence ratio, respectively. The values of thrust calculated with the high-dimensional virtual model show an average decrease of 2.01 % compared to those derived from the low-dimensional model. In addition, a higher Mach number results in lower effectiveness, higher air inlet temperature, and reduced resistance of the precooler to heat exchange imbalance caused by flow non-uniformity. These factors lead to an escalating relative deviation of the equivalence ratio between the two models, reaching 26.45 % at Mach 5.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.