Abstract

Medication errors, which could often be detected in advance, are a significant cause of patient deaths each year, highlighting the critical importance of medication safety. The rapid advancement of data analysis technologies has made intelligent medication assistance applications possible, and these applications rely heavily on medical knowledge graphs. However, current knowledge graph construction techniques are predominantly focused on general domains, leaving a gap in specialized fields, particularly in the medical domain for medication assistance. The specialized nature of medical knowledge and the distinct distribution of vocabulary between general and biomedical texts pose challenges. Applying general natural language processing techniques directly to the medical domain often results in lower accuracy due to the inadequate utilization of contextual semantics and entity information. To address these issues and enhance knowledge graph production, this paper proposes an optimized model for named entity recognition and relationship extraction in the Chinese medical domain. Key innovations include utilizing Medical Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (MCBERT) for character-level embeddings pre-trained on Chinese biomedical corpora, employing Bi-directional Gated Recurrent Unit (BiGRU) networks for extracting enriched contextual features, integrating a Conditional Random Field (CRF) layer for optimal label sequence output, using the Piecewise Convolutional Neural Network (PCNN) to capture comprehensive semantic information and fusing it with entity features for better classification accuracy, and implementing a microservices architecture for the medication assistance review system. These enhancements significantly improve the accuracy of entity relationship classification in Chinese medical texts. The model achieved good performance in recognizing most entity types, with an accuracy of 88.3%, a recall rate of 85.8%, and an F1 score of 87.0%. In the relationship extraction stage, the accuracy reached 85.7%, the recall rate 82.5%, and the F1 score 84.0%.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.