A Novel Classification of Esophageal Anastomotic Leaks and Its Impact on Healing Time After Esophagogastrostomy.

Background Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a severe complication after esophagectomy, but the classifications of anastomotic leakage and their respective healing times are poorly studied. Methods This study retrospectively analyzed 117 cases of AL among 2871 patients who underwent esophagectomy with circular stapled anastomosis of the esophagus and gastric tube at our hospital from January 1, 2019, to March 31, 2024. AL cases were categorized into four types based on the direction of leakage (anterior, right, posterior, and left). The differences in healing times among these four types were analyzed using the log-rank test. Results The incidence of AL was 4.3% (117/2728), with a median occurrence time of 9 days (IQR 5) and a median healing time of 56 days (IQR 64). Single cervical ALs accounted for only 17.5%, and their healing times were significantly shorter compared to intrathoracic leaks (33 days vs. 61 days, p = 0.018). Right-sided leaks were the most common (49.6%), while left-sided leaks healed faster than right- and posterior-sided leaks (42 days vs. 63 days vs. 70 days, p < 0.05). The occurrence of tracheoesophageal fistulas and pneumothorax led to prolonged healing times. BMI, diabetes, and neoadjuvant therapy did not influence healing time. Conclusion These findings provide valuable insights for clinicians to better understand the mechanisms of AL development and predict their healing times.

Introduction Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most severe complications following rectal cancer (RC) surgery, with significant implications for morbidity, mortality, and oncological outcomes. Identifying risk factors associated with AL may enhance surgical decision-making and improve patient prognosis. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including 42 adult patients who underwent RC resection at a hospital in Mexico City between January 2015 and December 2022. Demographic, clinical, pathological, and surgical variables were analyzed to assess their association with AL. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors. Results The overall incidence of AL was 11.9%, consistent with previous literature. Univariate analysis revealed no significant differences in patient-related factors such as age, BMI, ASA classification, diabetes mellitus, smoking, or biochemical markers (p>0.05). Treatment-related factors such as neoadjuvant therapy and diverting stoma (DS) placement did not show a significant association with AL. However, surgical factors played a crucial role: operative time was significantly longer in patients with AL (349.0 vs. 232.9 minutes, p=0.024), intraoperative blood loss was markedly higher (800.0 vs. 198.6 mL, p<0.001), and transfusion rates were elevated (60.0% vs. 13.5%, p=0.040). Tumor location in the middle rectum was more frequent among AL cases (60.0% vs. 18.9%, p=0.090). Postoperative complications were significantly more severe in patients with AL, with prolonged hospital stays (20.0 vs. 10.2 days, p=0.043) and increased reintervention rates (80.0% vs. 5.6%, p<0.001). In the logistic regression model, none of the analyzed variables reached statistical significance (p>0.99). However, operative time showed an odds ratio (OR) of 1.736 (p=0.997), suggesting that for each additional minute of surgery, the risk of AL could increase by 73.6%. Despite this trend, the wide confidence interval limits its precision and clinical applicability. Age showed an OR of 0.023 (p=0.998), potentially suggesting a 97.7% reduction in leakage risk for each additional year, although this result was not statistically significant and should be interpreted with caution. Conclusion Although no statistically significant risk factors were identified in the multivariate analysis, intraoperative variables such as prolonged surgical time, high blood loss, and transfusion requirement emerged as clinically relevant trends. These findings emphasize the need for optimizing surgical techniques and perioperative management to mitigate AL risk. Further studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to validate these associations and improve risk stratification models.

Objective: Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) was a very hot topic in the first few years since its appearance, but now more introspections and controversies on this procedure have emerged. One of the reasons why the Norwegian Ministry of Health stopped taTME was the high incidence of postoperative anastomotic leak. In current study, the incidence and risk factors of anastomotic leak after taTME were analyzed based on the data registered in the Chinese taTME Registry Collaborative (CTRC). Methods: A case-control study was carried out. Between November 15, 2017 and December 31, 2020, clinical data of 1668 patients undergoing taTME procedure registered in the CTRC database from 43 domestic centers were collected retrospectively. After excluding 98 cases without anastomosis and 109 cases without complete postoperative complication data, 1461 patients were finally enrolled for analysis. There were 1036 males (70.9%) and 425 females (29.1%) with mean age of (58.2±15.6) years and mean body mass index of (23.6±3.8) kg/m(2). Anastomotic leak was diagnosed and classified according to the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer (ISREC) criteria. The risk factors associated with postoperative anastomotic leak cases were analyzed. The impact of the cumulative number of taTME surgeries in a single center on the incidence of anastomotic leak was evaluated. As for those centers with the number of taTME surgery ≥ 40 cases, incidence of anastomic leak between 20 cases of taTME surgery in the early and later phases was compared. Results: Of 1461 patients undergoing taTME, 103(7.0%) developed anastomotic leak, including 71 (68.9%) males and 32 (31.1%) females with mean age of (59.0±13.9) years and mean body mass index of (24.5±5.7) kg/m(2). The mean distance between anastomosis site and anal verge was (2.6±1.4) cm. Thirty-nine cases (37.9%) were classified as ISREC grade A, 30 cases (29.1%) as grade B and 34 cases (33.0%) as grade C. Anastomotic leak occurred in 89 cases (7.0%,89/1263) in the laparoscopic taTME group and 14 cases (7.1%, 14/198) in the pure taTME group. Multivariate analysis showed that hand-sewn anastomosis (P=0.004) and the absence of defunctioning stoma (P=0.013) were independently associated with anastomotic leak after taTME. In the 16 centers (37.2%) which performed ≥ 30 taTME surgeries with cumulative number of 1317 taTME surgeries, 86 cases developed anastomotic leak (6.5%, 86/1317). And in the 27 centers which performed less than 30 taTME surgeries with cumulative number of 144 taTME surgeries, 17 cases developed anastomotic leak (11.8%, 17/144). There was significant difference between two kinds of center (χ(2)=5.513, P=0.019). Thirteen centers performed ≥ 40 taTME surgeries. In the early phase (the first 20 cases in each center), 29 cases (11.2%, 29/260) developed anastomotic leak, and in the later phase, 12 cases (4.6%, 12/260) developed anastomotic leak. The difference between the early phase and the later phase was statistically significant (χ(2)=7.652, P=0.006). Conclusion: The incidence of anastomotic leak after taTME may be reduced by using stapler and defunctioning stoma, or by accumulating experience.

This study investigated whether neoadjuvant therapies, such as neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT), and neoadjuvant radiotherapy (NRT), would affect the incidence of anastomotic leakage (AL) after esophageal cancer surgery. Published randomized controlled trials were reviewed, and the incidence of AL after esophageal cancer was statistically analyzed in each study. Meta-analysis was performed using Revman and Stata software. A total of 17 randomized controlled trials with 2874 patients were reviewed showing that, in general, preoperative neoadjuvant therapies were not significant risk factors for AL after esophageal cancer surgery (relative risk [RR] = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.64-1.04). NCRT and NRT did not significantly increase the risk of postoperative AL in patients with esophageal cancer (RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.63-1.05; RR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.14-2.97, respectively). Moreover, NCT has no significant correlation with the occurrence of AL (RR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.57-1.80). NCRT, NCT, and NRT do not significantly increase the incidence of gastroesophageal AL after esophageal cancer surgery.

To assess the incidence and independent risk factors for clinical anastomotic leakage (AL) in patients undergoing anterior resection(AR) or low anterior resection, (LAR) for rectal cancer. This was a retrospective case-control study of 550 patients with rectal cancer who underwent AR or LAR from April 2007 to March 2017 in Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University. The relationship between the incidence of AL and clinicopathological manifestations was analyzed by Chi-squared test and Fisher exact test, and the independent risk factors of AL were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. AL is defined as a defect (including necrosis or abscess formation) of the intestinal wall at the anastomotic site, leading to a communication between the intra- and extra-luminal compartments. AL can be divided into three grades. Grade A anastomotic leakage results in no change in the management of patients, whereas grade B leakage requires active therapeutic intervention but is manageable without re-laparotomy. Grade C anastomotic leakage requires re-laparotomy. AL was noted in 32(5.8%) of 550 patients with rectal cancer who underwent AR or LAR, including 15(46.9%), 4(12.5%), and 13 patients (40.6%) with Grades A, B, and C, respectively. Five patients(0.9%, 5/550) died peri-operatively. AL- and non-AL-related deaths occurred in 3 (9.4%, 3/32, all cases were Grade C) and 2 patients(0.4%, 2/518), respectively, with the two mortality rates being significant difference(P=0.002). Chi-squared test or Fisher exact test showed that the incidence of AL was associated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (P=0.011), intraoperative bleeding(≥100 ml)(χ2=11.980, P=0.001), and tension-reducing suture of anastomosis(P=0.015). The results of logistic regression analysis showed that the independent risk factors of AL were neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy(OR=2.402, 95%CI: 1.004-5.749, P=0.049), intraoperative bleeding(≥100 ml)(OR=2.971, 95%CI: 1.269-6.957, P=0.012) and tension-reducing suture of anastomosis(OR=2.304, 95%CI: 1.008-5.263, P=0.048). The incidence of AL in patients undergoing AR for rectal cancer is 5.8%. The high-risk factors for AL are neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, intraoperative bleeding (≥100 ml), and tension-reducing suture of anastomosis. Patients with these three risk factors have a high risk of AL rate, and a defunctioning stoma should be performed.

Anastomotic leak after colorectal resection: A population-based study of risk factors and hospital variation

A prospective non-randomized controlled study of vaseline-medicated gauze for topical management of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in pediatric hematology patients

The aim was to evaluate the association of neoadjuvant therapy with increases in the incidence of anastomotic leakage (AL) after middle and low rectal anterior resection. The electronic databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Ovid were searched between 1980 and 2015. The random effects model was used to model the pooled data to determine the odds ratio with 95% confidence interval. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the Q test and I2 statistics. Subgroup, sensitivity and meta-regression analysis was conducted to explore heterogeneity. Neoadjuvant therapy was not shown to increase the incidence of postoperative AL as demonstrated by an OR of 1.16 [95% CI 0.99-1.36; P=0.07 (random effects model)]. The subgroup analysis of neoadjuvant radiotherapy using the random effects model suggested that it did not increase the rate of postoperative AL (OR=1.24, 95% CI 0.97-1.58; P=0.08). The subgroup analysis of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy indicated that the rate of postoperative AL again did not increase with an OR=1.06 [95% CI 0.86-1.30; P=0.59 (random effects model)]. The interval to surgery after neoadjuvant therapy and preoperative radiotherapy (short or long course) was not associated with an increased incidence of postoperative AL. Neoadjuvant therapy does not appear to increase the incidence of postoperative AL after anterior resection for mid and low rectal cancer. In addition, neither the interval to surgery after neoadjuvant therapy nor the radiotherapy regimen increases the rate of postoperative AL.

Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy is a severe and life-threatening complication. Gastric ischemic preconditioning is a strategy for the improvement of anastomotic healing. Aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate the impact of gastric ischemic preconditioning on postoperative morbidity. A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies comparing patients undergoing gastric ischemic preconditioning before esophagectomy with nonpreconditioned patients. Meta-analysis was conducted for the overall incidence of anastomotic leakage, severe anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stricture, postoperative morbidity, and mortality. Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed concerning preconditioning technique, the interval between preconditioning and surgery and the extent of preconditioning. Fifteen cohort studies were identified. Gastric preconditioning was associated with reduced overall incidence of anastomotic leakage (OR 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53-1.0; P= 0.050) and severe anastomotic leakage (OR 0.27; 95% CI, 0.14-0.50; P< 0.010), but not with anastomotic stricture (OR 1.18; 95% CI 0.38 to 3.66; P= 0.780), major postoperative morbidity (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.45 to 2.36; P= 0.940) or mortality (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.39 to 1,23; P= 0.210). Subgroup analyses did not identify any differences between embolization and ligation while increasing the interval between preconditioning and esophagectomy as well as the extent of preconditioning might be beneficial. Gastric ischemic preconditioning may be associated with a reduced incidence of overall and severe anastomotic leakage. Randomized studies are necessary to further evaluate its impact on leakage, refine the technique and define patient populations that will benefit the most.

Objective: To investigate the risk factors of anastomotic leakage (AL) after laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer patient with neoadjuvant therapy and construct a nomogram prediction model. Methods: This study was a retrospective case-control study that collected and reviewed the clinicopathological data of 359 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery from January 2012 to January 2018, including 202 patients from the Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University and 157 patients from the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital. Inclusion criteria: (1) age ≥ 18 years old; (2) diagnosis as rectal cancer by biopsy before treatment; (3) distance from tumor to anus within 12 cm; (4) locally advanced stage (T3-T4 or N+) diagnosed by imaging (CT, MRI, PET or ultrasound); (5) standardized neoadjuvant therapy followed by laparoscopic radical operation. Exclusion criteria: (1) previous history of colorectal cancer surgery; (2) short-term or incomplete standardized neoadjuvant therapy; (3) Miles, Hartmann, emergency surgery, palliative resection; (4) conversion to open surgery. Clinicopathological data, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), preoperative albumin, distance from tumor to anus, operation hospital, American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA score), operation time, T stage, N stage, M stage, TNM stage, pathological complete response (pCR) were analyzed with univariate analysis to identify predictors for AL after laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer patient with neoadjuvant therapy. Then, incorporated predictors of AL, which were screened by multivariate logistic regression, were plotted by the "rms" package in R software to establish a nomogram model. According to the scale of the nomogram of each risk factor, the total score could be obtained by adding each single score, then the corresponding probability of postoperative AL could be acquired. The area under ROC curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the predictive ability of each risk factor and nomogram on model. AUC > 0.75 indicated that the model had good predictive ability. The Bootstrap method (1000 bootstrapping resamples) was applied as internal verification to show the robustness of the model. The discrimination of the nomogram was determined by calculating the average consistency index (C-index) whose rage was 0.5 to 1.0. Higher C-index indicated better consistency with actual risk. The calibration curve was used to assess the calibration of prediction model. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test yielding a non-significant statistic (P>0.05) suggested no departure from the perfect fit. Results: Of 359 cases, 224 were male, 135 were female, 189 were ≥ 55 years old, 98 had a BMI > 24 kg/m(2), 176 had preoperative albumin ≤ 40 g/L, 128 had distance from tumor to anus ≤ 5 cm, 257 were TNM 0-II stage, 102 were TNM III-IV stage, and 84 achieved pCR after neoadjuvant therapy. The incidence of postoperative AL was 9.5% (34/359). Univariate analysis showed that gender, preoperative albumin and distance from tumor to the anus were associated with postoperative AL (All P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that male (OR=2.480, 95% CI: 1.012-6.077, P=0.047), preoperative albumin ≤40 g/L (OR=5.319, 95% CI: 2.106-13.433, P<0.001) and distance from tumor to anus ≤ 5 cm (OR=4.339, 95% CI: 1.990-9.458, P<0.001) were significant independent risk factors for postoperative AL. According to these results, a nomogram prediction model was constructed. The male was for 55 points, the preoperative albumin ≤ 40 g/L was for 100 points, and the distance from tumor to the anus ≤ 5 cm was for 88 points. Adding all the points of each risk factor, the corresponding probability of total score would indicated the morbidity of postoperative AL predicted by this nomogram modal. The AUC of the nomogram was 0.792 (95% CI: 0.729-0.856), and the C-index was 0.792 after internal verification. The calibration curve showed that the predictive results were well correlated with the actual results (P=0.562). Conclusions: Male, preoperative albumin ≤ 40 g/L and distance from tumor to the anus ≤ 5 cm are independent risk factors for AL after laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer patient with neoadjuvant therapy. The nomogram prediction model is helpful to predict the probability of AL after surgery.

Is COVID-19 infection more severe in kidney transplant recipients?

Anastomotic leakage (AL) and small bowel obstruction (SBO) are common complications after rectal cancer radical surgery (Dixon). Although the commonly used defunctioning stoma (DS) can reduce the incidence and harm of AL, it increases the probability of other adverse consequences, including SBO. Therefore, a safe and effective method for preventing the complications related to the radical surgery of rectal cancer is urgently needed. Previous studies have found that transanal drainage tube (TDT) can have a positive impact on the incidence of these two complications by draining gas and feces from the intestinal lumen, without causing other serious consequences. Therefore, this article further explores the clinical benefits that TDT can bring by analyzing the clinical data of postoperative patients with rectal cancer. This study included 221 patients who underwent radical surgery (Dixon) for rectal cancer in Hubei Cancer Hospital from September 2020 to February 2023, determine whether it meets the inclusion criteria of this study based on preoperative examination, intraoperative exploration results, and treatment methods. DS was used in 70 patients and TDT in 88 patients during the surgery; meanwhile, no protective anastomotic measures were applied in 63 patients. Seventy patients subjected to DS were categorized as group 1, 88 patients subjected to TDT as group 2, and 63 patients with no protective measures for anastomosis as group 3. Through postoperative clinical manifestations, imaging examinations, and laboratory tests, a total of 18 cases of AL and 30 cases of SBO were identified in the three groups. The effectiveness of TDT and that of other surgical procedures in preventing complications, accelerating postoperative recovery, and reducing surgical costs were compared through univariate and multivariate analyses. The clinical features of the three groups have baseline comparability. No statistically difference was noted in baseline characteristics between three groups (all P>0.05). The incidence of AL and SBO in group 1 are 7.1% and 27.1%, in group 2 are 3.4% and 4.5%, and in group 3 are 15.9% and 11.1%. Compared to patients in no protective anastomotic measures with TDT and DS, TDT has a lower incidence of postoperative AL (P<0.05) and SBO (P>0.05), and faster postoperative recovery (P<0.05). The cost of inpatient surgery is not significantly different (P>0.05). Although DS can reduce the incidence of AL to a certain extent (P>0.05), it significantly increased the incidence of SBO (P<0.05), delayed postoperative defecation time (P<0.05) and caused higher cost (P<0.001). Compared to DS, the incidence of AL in TDT is not significantly different (P>0.05), but the incidence of SBO is noticeably lower (P<0.001), with faster postoperative recovery and less cost (P<0.05). TDT is a safer, more effective, and more economical surgery for preventing postoperative complications.

Sa2007 Intestinal Microbiota and Anastomotic Leakage of Stapled Colorectal Anastomoses

162P Evaluation of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in monitoring anastomotic leakage after radical total gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Incidence and Risk Factors of Surgical Complications and Anastomotic Leakage After Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Middle and Low Rectal Cancer