Abstract

Brain connectivity is studied as a functionally connected network using statistical methods such as measuring correlation or covariance. The non-invasive neuroimaging techniques such as Electroencephalography (EEG) signals are converted to networks by transforming the signals into a Correlation Matrix and analyzing the resulting networks. Here, four learning models, namely, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN), are implemented on two different types of correlation matrices: Correlation Matrix (static connectivity) and Time-resolved Correlation Matrix (dynamic connectivity), to classify them either on their psychometric assessment or the effect of therapy. These correlation matrices are different from traditional learning techniques in the sense that they incorporate theory-based graph features into the learning models, thus providing novelty to this study. The EEG data used in this study is trail-based/event-related from five different experimental paradigms, of which can be broadly classified as working memory tasks and assessment of emotional states (depression, anxiety, and stress). The classifications based on RNN provided higher accuracy (74–88%) than the other three models (50–78%). Instead of using individual graph features, a Correlation Matrix provides an initial test of the data. When compared with the Time-resolved Correlation Matrix, it offered a 4–5% higher accuracy. The Time-resolved Correlation Matrix is better suited for dynamic studies here; it provides lower accuracy when compared to the Correlation Matrix, a static feature.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThe EEG data is represented as a two-dimensional matrix, which consists of electric potentials on one axis and the electrode number on the other axis

  • The performance of Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) classifiers shows up to 94.50% and 88.64% accuracies for each of the working memory tasks, which outperforms most of the previous works reviewed

  • The poor performance of Support Vector Machine (SVM) highlights the shortcomings of the method adopted in this study in algorithms that are sensitive to the dimensions of the data

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The EEG data is represented as a two-dimensional matrix, which consists of electric potentials on one axis and the electrode number on the other axis. This form of EEG data makes it easy to use in machine learning models [2]. With its high temporal resolution, EEG data can provide information regarding the functional connectivity within the brain, thereby providing a topological understanding of the functioning of the human brain [3]. This is usually carried out by transforming the electrical potentials into a Correlation Matrix [4]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.