Abstract
In the paper “Fault-free Mutually Independent Hamiltonian Cycles in Hypercubes with Faulty Edges” (J. Comb. Optim. 13:153–162, 2007), the authors claimed that an n-dimensional hypercube can be embedded with (n−1−f)-mutually independent Hamiltonian cycles when f≤n−2 faulty edges may occur accidentally. However, there are two mistakes in their proof. In this paper, we give examples to explain why the proof is deficient. Then we present a correct proof.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
