Abstract

AbstractWe developed an updated nonstationary bias‐correction method for a monthly global climate model of temperature and precipitation. The proposed method combines two widely used quantile mapping bias‐correction methods to eliminate potential illogical values of the variable. Instead of empirical parameter estimation in the more‐common quantile mapping method, our study compared bias‐correction performance when parametric or nonparametric procedures were used to estimate the probability distribution. The results showed our proposed bias‐correction method to be very effective in reducing the model bias: it removed over 80% and 83% of model bias for surface air temperature and precipitation, respectively, during the validation period. Compared with a widely used method of bias correction (delta change), our proposed technique demonstrates improved correction of the distribution of variables. In addition, nonparametric estimation procedures further reduced the mean absolute errors in temperature and precipitation during the validation period by approximately 2% and 0.4%, respectively, compared with parametric procedures. The proposed method can remove over 40% and 60% of the uncertainty from model temperature and precipitation projections, respectively, at the global land scale.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.