Abstract
ABSTRACT During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Chinese state temporarily locked down physical courtrooms and fully relied on online trials based on videoconference technology. This raises the question of how computer-mediated communication affects the realization of justice. This question is particularly significant for criminal cases, where assessing the credibility of evidence, debating between involved actors, and establishing legal identity heavily affect the life-altering sentence. Based on the systemic functional-multimodal discourse analysis (SF-MDA) of a case recording, this study shows that China’s online courts are textually unregulated, with inscribed unbalanced power relations that favor the judge and/or procurator against the defendants. It also finds ineffective ideational meaning-making, the failure to clarify legal jargon and procedures for defendants, and the lack of defense support. These problems illustrate that the current adoption of videoconferencing technology in criminal trials can seriously undermine the court’s constitutionality and legitimacy. Although online courts are a welcome alternative that can help protect public health and avoid delays in the disposal of cases, their currently disorganized implementation, affordabilities, and technical problems compromise justice.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
