Abstract
Recently, Turkish policy-makers defined Turkey as a ‘natural born mediator’ and called Turkey’s engagement in good offices and mediation part of a new vision in Turkish foreign policy. This was also characterized by the media as a ‘new sector’ in Turkish foreign policy. Although Turkey’s new role was subject to extensive public and media debate, academic literature did not cover it adequately, rather using it as further evidence for their diverse theoretical frameworks. This paper attempts to open up a debate on Turkey’s newly adopted role as a mediator and analyzes it from a rational choice institutionalist point of view. It concludes that the EU conditionality has been an instrumental but not a driving factor in Turkey’s newly adopted role. It has been used by governments since 1987, as the timeline of this paper indicates, as a way to demonstrate Turkey’s adherence to the policy of good neighborly relations and the peaceful settlement of disputes. Even after the EU suspended negotiations, Turkey’s active involvement in good offices and mediation missions did not diminish nor did its reduced credibility result in the reversal of the process.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
