Abstract
This paper challenges the W. M. Hanemann [ Amer. J. Agr. Econom. 66, 332–341 (1984)] and C. Sellar, J. P. Chavas, and J. R. Stoll [ J. Environ. Econom. Management 13, 382–390 (1986)] utilizations of logit models to estimate the value of non-market resources from “referendum” survey data. These data are more informative than conventional choice data. The “random utility” interpretation of logit models is therefore too restrictive. Bypassing the utility function entirely, it will be shown that parameters and standard errors for utility-theoretic inverse Hicksian demand functions can be extracted directly and much more simply. Estimated demand functions need not be limited to those corresponding to the linear-in-parameters utility difference specifications which can be handled by packaged logit programs.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
