Abstract

BackgroundNetworks or graphs play an important role in the biological sciences. Protein interaction networks and metabolic networks support the understanding of basic cellular mechanisms. In the human brain, networks of functional or structural connectivity model the information-flow between cortex regions. In this context, measures of network properties are needed. We propose a new measure, Ndim, estimating the complexity of arbitrary networks. This measure is based on a fractal dimension, which is similar to recently introduced box-covering dimensions. However, box-covering dimensions are only applicable to fractal networks. The construction of these network-dimensions relies on concepts proposed to measure fractality or complexity of irregular sets in mathbb {R}^{n}.ResultsThe network measure Ndim grows with the proliferation of increasing network connectivity and is essentially determined by the cardinality of a maximum k-clique, where k is the characteristic path length of the network. Numerical applications to lattice-graphs and to fractal and non-fractal graph models, together with formal proofs show, that Ndim estimates a dimension of complexity for arbitrary graphs. Box-covering dimensions for fractal graphs rely on a linear log−log plot of minimum numbers of covering subgraph boxes versus the box sizes. We demonstrate the affinity between Ndim and the fractal box-covering dimensions but also that Ndim extends the concept of a fractal dimension to networks with non-linear log−log plots. Comparisons of Ndim with topological measures of complexity (cost and efficiency) show that Ndim has larger informative power. Three different methods to apply Ndim to weighted networks are finally presented and exemplified by comparisons of functional brain connectivity of healthy and depressed subjects.ConclusionWe introduce a new measure of complexity for networks. We show that Ndim has the properties of a dimension and overcomes several limitations of presently used topological and fractal complexity-measures. It allows the comparison of the complexity of networks of different type, e.g., between fractal graphs characterized by hub repulsion and small world graphs with strong hub attraction. The large informative power and a convenient computational CPU-time for moderately sized networks may make Ndim a valuable tool for the analysis of biological networks.

Highlights

  • Networks or graphs play an important role in the biological sciences

  • We find several advantages of our new measure: compared to cost and efficiency Ndim has stronger informative power, as complexity differences in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) correlation networks between healthy and depressed subjects are increased for Ndim

  • Though the algorithm to calculate Ndim is NP-complete, we find that CPU time is quite low for moderate network sizes, for large sized networks we discuss the introduction of lower bound constraints

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Networks or graphs play an important role in the biological sciences. Protein interaction networks and metabolic networks support the understanding of basic cellular mechanisms. Networks of functional or structural connectivity model the information-flow between cortex regions In this context, measures of network properties are needed. We propose a new measure, Ndim, estimating the complexity of arbitrary networks This measure is based on a fractal dimension, which is similar to recently introduced box-covering dimensions. Box-covering dimensions are only applicable to fractal networks The construction of these network-dimensions relies on concepts proposed to measure fractality or complexity of irregular sets in Rn. Network or graph theory is of increasing importance for the analysis of biological systems. Our concept of complexity is based on the connectivity of a graph Simple examples of this type of complexity are the cost or the efficiency, more involved examples are the box-counting dimensions [10, 11] introduced recently. Practical applicability of Ndim to such cases will be demonstrated by the introduction of convenient lower bounds

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.