Abstract
Abstract Construction contracts in Egypt are governed by a myriad of rules. BOT and other similar contracts are of a mixed nature, which entails the application of both public and private law rules. Therefore, the solution to issues like Variation of Works or Termination will depend on whether or not the contract is characterized as an administrative contract. Adding another layer of complication, the Dipco judgment has reopened the debate about arbitrating BOT and other contracts of similar nature, a subject supposedly closed since 1997 by Article 1(2) of the Arbitration Law.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
