Abstract

BackgroundThe recently developed RNA interference (RNAi) technology has created an unprecedented opportunity which allows the function of individual genes in whole organisms or cell lines to be interrogated at genome-wide scale. However, multiple issues, such as off-target effects or low efficacies in knocking down certain genes, have produced RNAi screening results that are often noisy and that potentially yield both high rates of false positives and false negatives. Therefore, integrating RNAi screening results with other information, such as protein-protein interaction (PPI), may help to address these issues.ResultsBy analyzing 24 genome-wide RNAi screens interrogating various biological processes in Drosophila, we found that RNAi positive hits were significantly more connected to each other when analyzed within a protein-protein interaction network, as opposed to random cases, for nearly all screens. Based on this finding, we developed a network-based approach to identify false positives (FPs) and false negatives (FNs) in these screening results. This approach relied on a scoring function, which we termed NePhe, to integrate information obtained from both PPI network and RNAi screening results. Using a novel rank-based test, we compared the performance of different NePhe scoring functions and found that diffusion kernel-based methods generally outperformed others, such as direct neighbor-based methods. Using two genome-wide RNAi screens as examples, we validated our approach extensively from multiple aspects. We prioritized hits in the original screens that were more likely to be reproduced by the validation screen and recovered potential FNs whose involvements in the biological process were suggested by previous knowledge and mutant phenotypes. Finally, we demonstrated that the NePhe scoring system helped to biologically interpret RNAi results at the module level.ConclusionBy comprehensively analyzing multiple genome-wide RNAi screens, we conclude that network information can be effectively integrated with RNAi results to produce suggestive FPs and FNs, and to bring biological insight to the screening results.

Highlights

  • The recently developed RNA interference (RNAi) technology has created an unprecedented opportunity which allows the function of individual genes in whole organisms or cell lines to be interrogated at genome-wide scale

  • RNAi hits have higher network connectivity than random chance hits The Drosophila protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was built from PPIs in the STRING database [24]

  • We evaluate the performance of each scoring method based on two quantities: the relative rank (RR) of simulated false negatives (FNs) among nonhits and the RR of simulated false positives (FPs) among hits

Read more

Summary

Results

RNAi hits have higher network connectivity than random chance hits The Drosophila protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was built from PPIs in the STRING database [24]. We needed to quantify the overall similarity between a gene and its neighbors, or in an extreme case, all the remaining genes in the network In this analysis, we considered three different summation formulas to calculate the overall similarity (see Methods for details). In total, we compared twelve different scoring functions, i.e., combinations of four pair-wise similarity measurements and three summation formulas (see Additional file 1 – Table S2) We call these scoring functions Network RNAi Phenotype (NePhe) scoring functions, since we integrate both the network topology and RNAi screen data to derive the NePhe scores. As long as the original hit sets are significantly enriched for TPs (which we believe to be true for most screens), the rank-based test should reflect the relative performance of each method. (a) Overall performance of different methods in identifying FNs (b) Overall performance of different methods in identifying FPs

Background
Methods
Discussion and Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.