Abstract

AbstractA multiprocess Eyring model is developed with a particular aim of predicting the localized instability occurring in “necking” polymers when cold‐drawn. Differences from using single and multiple Eyring processes are examined using a published data‐set for polypropylene test pieces; it is shown that a four Eyring process model can simultaneously fit both necking stretch ratio and draw force data for uniaxial stretching, whereas with a single process only one measurement could be fitted accurately. The multi process Eyring model is shown to give significantly more accurate predictions than a necking hyperelastic model. The multiprocess model is assessed against the same material undergoing a complex constant‐width elongation. It is shown that agreement is quantitatively good for both drawing force and surface deformation, with some minor differences in transverse force and surface stretch. A pronounced intermittent stretching pattern that is seen on the experimental test piece is replicated by the multiprocess Eyring simulation, but is absent using the hyperelastic model. A method is described to deform a photograph of the original specimen according to a finite element solution. The method is shown to give a clear indication of the accuracy of the model in predicting final form. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.