A Multicenter Double-blind Randomized Sham-controlled Trial Assessing the EndoBarrier Duodenal-jejunal Bypass Liner for the Treatment of Poorly Controlled type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Concomitant Obesity: The ENDO Trial.

BackgroundThe EndoBarrier®(GI Dynamics Inc., Boston, MA, USA) is an endoluminal duodenal–jejunal bypass liner developed for the treatment of patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Meta-analyses of its effects on glycaemia and weight have called for larger randomised controlled trials with longer follow-up.ObjectivesThe primary objective was to compare intensive medical therapy with a duodenal–jejunal bypass liner with intensive medical therapy without a duodenal–jejunal bypass liner, comparing effectiveness on the metabolic state as defined by the International Diabetes Federation as a glycated haemoglobin level reduction of ≥ 20%. The secondary objectives were to compare intensive medical therapy with a duodenal–jejunal bypass liner with intensive medical therapy without a duodenal–jejunal bypass liner, comparing effectiveness on the metabolic state as defined by the International Diabetes Federation as a glycated haemoglobin level of < 42 mmol/mol, blood pressure of < 135/85 mmHg, and the effectiveness on total body weight loss. Additional secondary outcomes were to investigate the cost-effectiveness and mechanism of action of the effect of a duodenal–jejunal bypass liner on brain reward system responses, insulin sensitivity, eating behaviour and metabonomics.DesignA multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.SettingImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust.ParticipantsPatients aged 18–65 years with a body mass index of 30–50 kg/m2and with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus who were on oral glucose-lowering medications.InterventionsParticipants were randomised equally to receive intensive medical therapy alongside a duodenal–jejunal bypass liner device (n = 85) or intensive medical therapy alone for 12 months (n = 85), and were followed up for a further 12 months.ResultsThere was no significant difference between groups in the percentage of patients achieving the glycaemic primary or secondary outcomes [primary outcome at 12 months: duodenal–jejunal bypass liner group 54.5% vs. control group 55.2% (odds ratio 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.44 to 1.98;p = 0.85); primary outcome at 24 months: duodenal–jejunal bypass liner group 39.7% vs. control group 36.5% (odds ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 0.52 to 2.47;p = 0.75)]. Significantly more patients in the duodenal–jejunal bypass liner group than in the control group lost > 15% of their total body weight (duodenal–jejunal bypass liner group 24.2% vs. control group 3.7%; odds ratio 8.33, 95% confidence interval 1.78 to 39.0;p = 0.007) and achieved blood pressure targets (duodenal–jejunal bypass liner group 68.2% vs. control group 44.4%; odds ratio 2.57, 95% confidence interval 1.21 to 5.48;p = 0.014). These differences were observed at 12 months but not at 24 months. There were more adverse events in the duodenal–jejunal bypass liner group, including one liver abscess. The increase in peripheral insulin sensitivity was superior in the duodenal–jejunal bypass liner group. Spectroscopic analyses of plasma, urine and faeces revealed several distinct metabolic perturbations in the duodenal–jejunal bypass liner group but not in the control group. Brain reward responses to food cues were not different between groups. The number of mean quality-adjusted life-years gained was similar in both groups and the additional costs of the duodenal–jejunal bypass liner may outweigh the value of the health benefits by £2560 per patient treated.ConclusionsThe results show that the endoluminal duodenal–jejunal bypass liner was not superior to intensive medical therapy for glycaemic control and was associated with more adverse events. The duodenal–jejunal bypass liner was associated with significant weight loss and improvement in cardiometabolic parameters at 12 months but not at 24 months. Economic evaluation showed that the bypass liner was not cost-effective for glycaemic control or for weight loss.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN30845205.FundingThis project was funded by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME) Programme, a Medical Research Council (MRC) and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) partnership. This will be published in full inEfficacy and Mechanism Evaluation; Vol. 7, No. 6. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. This study was executed with the support of GI Dynamics Inc. and with the kind support of Nutricia Advanced Medical Nutrition for providing oral nutritional supplements.

Investigate the safety and efficacy of 6 months' duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) treatment in comparison with dietary intervention for obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The DJBL is a bariatric procedure involving an impermeable sleeve that is delivered endoscopically in the proximal intestine. This procedure not only is less invasive than conventional surgical techniques but also has beneficial effects on obesity and T2DM. A multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted. Seventy-seven patients with obesity and T2DM were included. Thirty-eight patients were randomized to 6 months' DJBL treatment in combination with dietary intervention (34 successfully implanted, 31 completed the study), 39 patients received only dietary intervention (controls, 35 completed the study). Total study duration for both groups was 12 months, including 6 months of post-DJBL removal follow-up. After 6 months, just before DJBL removal, the DJBL group had lost 32.0% [22.0%-46.7%] of their excess weight versus 16.4% [4.1%-34.6%] in the control group (P < 0.05). Glycated hemoglobin A1c levels improved to 7.0% [6.4%-7.5%] in the DJBL group and to 7.9% [6.6%-8.3%] in the control group (P < 0.05). In addition, 85.3% of DJBL patients showed decreased postprandial glucose excursions versus 48.7% of control patients (P < 0.05). At 12 months, excess weight loss of the DJBL group was 19.8% [10.6%-45.0%] versus 11.7% [1.4%-25.4%] in the control group (P < 0.05). HbA1c was 7.3% [6.6%-8.0%] versus 8.0% [6.8%-8.8%], DJBL versus control respectively (P = ns). The DJBL is a safe and effective alternative to invasive bariatric procedures. Six months of DJBL treatment combined with diet leads to superior weight loss and improvement of T2DM when compared with diet alone.

The duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) is an endoscopic treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and (morbid) obesity. The aim of the current study was to determine its efficacy and safety profile. Inclusion criteria for treatment with a DJBL were: age 18-70years, BMI 28-45kg/m2, and T2DM with a HbA1c>48mmol/mol. Primary outcomes were changes in HbA1c and body weight. Secondary outcomes included changes in blood pressure, lipids, and anti-diabetic medication. Predictive factors for success of treatment with the DJBL were determined. Between 2011 and 2014, 185 out of 198 patients successfully underwent a DJBL implantation procedure, with an intended implantation time of 12months. In these 185 patients, body weight decreased by 12.8±8.0kg (total body weight loss of 11.9±6.9%, p<0.001), HbA1c decreased from 67 to 61mmol/mol (p<0.001) despite a reduction in anti-diabetic medication, and blood pressure and serum lipid levels all decreased. In total, 57 (31%) DJBLs were explanted early after a median duration of 33weeks. Adverse events occurred in 17% of patients. C-peptide ≥1.0nmol/L and body weight ≥107kg at screening were independent predictive factors for success. Treatment with the DJBL in T2DM patients with (morbid) obesity results in improvement in glucose control, a reduction in anti-diabetic medication, and significant weight loss. The largest changes are observed within the first 3-6months. Initial C-peptide levels and body weight may help to select patients with the greatest chance of success.

ObjectiveThe aim of this research was to study the duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) treatment for obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in patients after dietary treatment in a cross-over design.BackgroundDJBL treatment has been proven effective for treatment of obesity and T2DM. However, data on safety and efficacy of a 12-month DJBL treatment is limited.MethodsIn 2014, our research group reported on a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Patients were randomized to DJBL or dietary treatment (control group). Twenty-eight patients crossed over after their dietary treatment and received up to 12 months of DJBL treatment. Patient visits were conducted at baseline, during DJBL treatment (1 week, 1–6, 9, 12 months) and 6 months after removal of the liner. Patients underwent a standard physical examination, blood sampling, assessment of adverse events, nutritional and diabetes counseling, and a standardized meal tolerance test.ResultsOf the 28 patients included in this study, 24 patients completed 6 months of treatment. Eighteen patients were extended to 12 months of DJBL treatment; 13 patients completed this treatment period. After 6 months of DJBL treatment, a significant increase in excess weight loss (EWL) and decrease in weight, BMI, HbA1c, fasting glucose, cholesterol, HDL and LDL improved significantly. After 12 months of DJBL treatment, these parameters stabilized.ConclusionsThe DJBL is an effective, minimally invasive treatment option. Even after successful treatment with dietary restrictions, the DJBL is still capable of significantly reducing weight and improving cardiovascular and type 2 diabetes mellitus parameters in obese patients.

Objective:The aim of this study was to examine the clinical efficacy and safety of the duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) while in situ for 12 months and for 12 months after explantation.Summary Background Data:This is the largest randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the DJBL, a medical device used for the treatment of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity. Endoscopic interventions have been developed as potential alternatives to those not eligible or fearful of the risks of metabolic surgery.Methods:In this multicenter open-label RCT, 170 adults with inadequately controlled T2DM and obesity were randomized to intensive medical care with or without the DJBL. Primary outcome was the percentage of participants achieving a glycated hemoglobin reduction of ≥20% at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included weight loss and cardiometabolic risk factors at 12 and 24 months.Results:There were no significant differences in the percentage of patients achieving the primary outcome between both groups at 12 months [DJBL 54.6% (n = 30) vs control 55.2% (n = 32); odds ratio (OR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44–2.0; P = 0.85]. Twenty-four percent (n = 16) patients achieved ≥15% weight loss in the DJBL group compared to 4% (n = 2) in the controls at 12 months (OR 8.3, 95% CI: 1.8–39; P = .007). The DJBL group experienced superior reductions in systolic blood pressure, serum cholesterol, and alanine transaminase at 12 months. There were more adverse events in the DJBL group.Conclusions:The addition of the DJBL to intensive medical care was associated with superior weight loss, improvements in cardiometabolic risk factors, and fatty liver disease markers, but not glycemia, only while the device was in situ. The benefits of the devices need to be balanced against the higher rate of adverse events when making clinical decisions.Trial Registration:ISRCTN30845205. isrctn.org; Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme, a Medical Research Council and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) partnership reference 12/10/04.

Duodenal-jejunal by-pass liner (DJBL) is an endoscopically implantable device designed to non-invasively mimic the effects of surgical gastric by-pass. However, the exact mechanisms responsible for improved glucose control associated with DJBL are still unclear. The aim of our study was to assess the effect of DJBL on insulin sensitivity and secretion in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity. Twenty-one obese subjects with T2DM (15 males, age 52.3 ± 11.2 years) underwent the implantation of the EndoBarrier DJBL (GI Dynamics, U.S.). Anthropometric, biochemical and hormonal parameters were measured before and 10 months after the implantation of DJBL. Insulin sensitivity was assessed using euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp. Standard parameters including glucose disposal rate (M) and metabolic clearance rate of glucose (MCG) were calculated based on clamp results. Over 10 months the implantation of DJBL decreased body weight (body mass index 41.6 ± 6.1 vs. 37.5 ± 4.2 kg/m2, p&amp;lt;0.001) and improved glucose control (fasting blood glucose 10.5 ± 2.5 vs. 8.4 ± 2.4 mmol/l, p&amp;lt;0.001; HbA1C 74.7 ± 17.8 vs. 55.6 ± 12.4 mmol/mol, p&amp;lt;0.001). These improvements were accompanied by a marked increase in insulin sensitivity as shown by the results of the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp (M 1.5 ± 0.8 vs. 2.6 ± 1.0 mg.kg-1.min-1, p&amp;lt;0.001; MCG 1.4 ± 0.7 vs. 2.6 ± 0.2 mg.kg-1.min-1, p&amp;lt;0.001). In contrast, insulin secretion was not affected by DJBL (fasting insulin 21.8 ± 13.0 vs. 18.5 ± 9.5 mIU/l, p=0.312; C-peptide 2.7 ± 1.1 vs. 2.4 ± 1.1 nmol/l, p=0.172). To conclude the improvement in glucose control associated with the implantation of Endobarrier DJBL is primarily caused by increased insulin sensitivity rather than augmented insulin secretion. Disclosure M. Kudlackova: None. M. Mraz: None. M. Haluzik: None. T. Pelikanova: None. M. Benes: None. D. Lapesova: None. D. Kobrova: None. Z. Vlasakova: None. O. Brizova: None. Z. Lacinova: None. Funding Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IN00023001)

The duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) is an endoscopic device mimicking surgical duodenal-jejunal bypass, and is indicated for the treatment of obesity-associated type 2 diabetes mellitus. This analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the DJBL in comparison to lifestyle changes and antidiabetic drugs. To determine the efficacy and long-term safety of the DJBL, data concerning 235 obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from the German DJBL registry were analysed. For comparison with standard treatment, propensity-score-matching with patients from the German DPV registry, including the matching parameters sex, age, diabetes duration, baseline BMI and baseline HbA1c, was applied. The final matched cohort consisted of 111 patients in the DJBL group and 222 matched control DPV patients. Mean treatment time with the DJBL was 47.5 ± 12.2 weeks, mean BMI reduction was 5.0 kg/m2 (P < .001) and mean HbA1c reduction was 1.3% (11.9 mmol/mol) (P < .001). Reduction of antidiabetic medications and improvements in other metabolic and cardiovascular risk parameters was observed. In comparison to the matched control group, mean reductions in HbA1c (-1.37% vs -0.51% [12.6 vs 3.2 mmol/mol]; P < .0001) and BMI (-3.02 kg/m2 vs -0.39 kg/m2 ; P < .0001) were significantly higher. Total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and blood pressure were also significantly better. This study provides the largest, so far, hypothesis-generating evidence for a putative positive risk/benefit ratio for treatment of obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with the DJBL as an alternative treatment option for this patient population.

Introduction: The global increase in obesity incidence results in an increase of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Surgical treatment has proven to be effective, however it carries a high risk of complications. The duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (EndoBarrier®, GI Dynamics, EB) is an endoscopic implant that mimics the intestinal bypass portion of the Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. It results in weight loss and improvements in glucose control in obese patients with T2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Aims and Methods: This is a analysis of a prospective, controlled, multicentre study aimed to identify factors associated with an outcome of EB for T2DM. Results: Seventy subjects (45 with an implant, 25 controls) were included in the study. The groups were comparable with respect to age, gender, BMI (mean 41.7 vs. 39.5 kg/m2), T2DM duration (7.8 vs. 8.3 years), HbA1c level (88 vs. 86 mmol/mol) and T2DM treatment. In the EB group, all devices were successfully implanted. Only 6 devices had to be explanted prior to the end of the 10 months study period (bleeding, dislocation and need for ERCP because of choledocholithiasis). At 10 months there was significantly greater weight loss and %EWL (19% vs. 7% and 43 vs. 12) and significantly improved long term compensation of T2DM marker HbA1c (decreased by 25 vs. 10 mmol/mol) in the EB group. T2DM medicinal treatment could be reduced in more device subjects than controls. There was no serious adverse event. Deepness of anchor ingrow, lower initial BMI and lower body height were identified as positive factors for efficacy of EB for T2DM compensation. Conclusion: The EB is safe when implanted for 10 months, and results in significant weight loss and HbA1c reduction. Deepness of anchor ingrow, lower initial BMI and lower body height could be positive factors for efficacy. Disclosure M. Benes: None. P. Drastich: None. T. Hucl: None.

Safety experience with the duodenal-jejunal bypass liner: an endoscopic treatment for diabetes and obesity

The duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) is a less-invasive treatment of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This is a systematic review and meta-analysis including randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing DJBL versus sham or pharmacotherapies aiming to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of DJBL. Ten RCTs (681 patients) were included. The DJBL group showed superior excess weight loss (+ 11.4% [+ 7.75 to + 15.03%], p < 0.00001) and higher decrease in HbA1c compared to the control group (- 2.73 ± 0.5 vs. - 1.73 ± 0.4, p = 0.0001). Severe adverse events (SAEs) occurred in 19.7%. The DJBL did not reach the ASGE/ASMBS thresholds for the treatment of obesity. However, it is important to state that many SAEs were not really severe. Therefore, we believe this therapy plays an important role in the management obesity and T2DM.

Bariatric surgery has experienced a dramatic evolution over the last years. The search for less invasive procedures to improve the benefit/risk ratio and to expand the benefits of these interventions to a larger group of patients has led to the development of primary endoscopic procedures for the treatment of obesity and its associated diseases. The duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) is a highly flexible and impermeable tube that can be endoscopically implanted and explanted. It is specifically designed to create a duodenal-jejunal exclusion. The DJBL treatment has now become a primary intervention for the treatment of morbid obesity and to improve glycemic control in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Available evidence supports the role of DJBL in treating obesity and improving glycemic control in a significant proportion of severely obese diabetic patients. Early removal and a higher rate of serious adverse events in clinical practice are the most important limitations in terms of safety. Randomized clinical trials are needed to evaluate the safety/efficacy ratio of the procedure and its clinical use in future.

Tu1471 A New Approach in the Treatment of Weight Regain After Bariatric Surgery: The Argon Plasma Coagulation of the Anastomosis

Tu1470 Interim Results of a Multi-Center, Prospective, Controlled Trial of the Duodenal-Jejunal Bypass Liner for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Obese Patients: Are There Any Factors Predicting a Sub-Optimal Effect?

Tu1472 Intragastric Balloon As a Treatment Method for Excess Weight: A Large Brazilian Experience

The endoscopically implanted duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) is an impermeable fluoropolymer device which prevents food making contact with the proximal intestine, thus inducing weight loss and improvement of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, weight and HbA1c levels generally increase post explantation. This study investigated the safety and feasibility of early DJBL reimplantation in five patients with obesity whose glucose levels had relapsed post explantation, examining the effect of reimplantation on weight loss, BMI and T2DM management. All DJBL implantation and explantation procedures were performed without complications. Despite reduction of T2DM medications, reduction in body weight and HbA1c levels resumed after reimplantation. In conclusion, early reimplantation of DJBL appears feasible, safe and effective.