Abstract

This paper proposes a multi-class classification model for technology evaluation (TE) using patent documents. TE is defined as converting technology quality to its present value; it supports efficient research and development using intellectual property rights–research & development (IP–R&D) and decision-making by companies. Through IP–R&D, companies create their patent portfolios and develop technology management strategies. They protect core patents and use those patents to cooperate with other companies. In modern society, as conversion technology has been rapidly developed, previous TE methods became difficult to apply to technology. This is because they relied on expert-based qualitative methods. Qualitative results are difficult to use to guarantee objectivity. Many previous studies have proposed models for evaluating technology based on patent data to address these limitations. However, those models can lose contextual information during the preprocessing of bibliographic information and require a lexical analyzer suitable for processing terminology in patents. This study uses a lexical analyzer produced using a deep learning structure to overcome this limitation. Furthermore, the proposed method uses quantitative information and bibliographic information of patents as explanatory variables and classifies the technology into multiple classes. The multi-class classification is conducted by sequentially evaluating the value of a technology. This method returns multiple classes in order, enabling class comparison. Moreover, it is model-agnostic, enabling diverse algorithms to be used. We conducted experiments using actual patent data to examine the practical applicability of the proposed methodology. Based on the experiment results, the proposed method was able to classify actual patents into an ordered multi-class. In addition, it was possible to guarantee the objectivity of the results. This is because our model used the information in the patent specification. Furthermore, the model using both quantitative and bibliographic information exhibited higher classification performance than the model using only quantitative information. Therefore, the proposed model can contribute to the sustainable growth of companies by classifying the value of technology into more detailed categories.

Highlights

  • Intellectual property rights–research & development (IP–R&D) refers to research and development using intellectual property rights

  • We propose a technology evaluation (TE) model based on data to support efficient IP–R&D and decision-making in companies

  • We introduce the concept of sequential evaluation (SE) and classify it in order of multiple classes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Intellectual property rights–research & development (IP–R&D) refers to research and development using intellectual property rights. Trappey et al (2019) proposed a multi-layer neural network model that evaluates the value of technology using quantitative information, such as the number of claims and the number of citations. Because they used only the number of texts in the bibliographic information of the patent, the model could not reflect the features of the language. This study proposes a data-based TE model by addressing the limitations of previous studies It uses the quantitative and bibliographic information of a patent as variables in the predictive model for objective TE. The proposed method is designed to classify the cost of technology into multiple classes using both types of patent information as explanatory variables.

Literature Review of Multi-Class Classification Methods
Preprocessing Text Information
Optimizing the Models for Each Splitting Point
Data Description
Experimental Study
Discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.