Abstract

ABSTRACT In this article, we argue that electoral context affects the projection mechanisms inherent within polling. This insight applies both to the estimation of party vote shares by pollsters and to poll-based seat projections. To test this argument, we analyse 794 in-campaign polls covering the UK's 21 post-war general elections, as well as an updated version of Jennings and Wlezien’s (Jennings, Will, and Christopher Wlezien. 2018. “Election Polling Errors Across Time and Space.” Nature Human Behaviour 2 (4): 276–283) international polling dataset. We demonstrate that the election level houses a substantial portion of the observed variance within polling error. This finding is valid across several modelling approaches and a range of measures of polling accuracy both within and beyond the UK. Within the UK, we show that the election level is a particularly important locus of variance when it comes to analysing whether polls give rise to misleading expectations concerning seat distributions.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.