Abstract

Plasmid DNA binding to cationic liposomes and the ability to bind these liposomes, both with and without complexed plasmid DNA, to cation-exchange microspheres were examined. The two plasmids tested were pCMV-CAT and pRcCMV-p53. Commercial Lipofectin, Lipofectace, Lipofectamine, and three formulation ratios of dimethyldioctadecyl ammonium bromide (DDAB):phosphatidylcholine and DDAB:dioleoylphosphatidyl ethanolamine liposomes were evaluated. The binding of empty liposomes onto microspheres increased and the release from microspheres decreased with increasing ratio of cationic:neutral lipid. Of all liposomes, Lipofectamine bound the most copy numbers of both plasmids. The amount of plasmid bound on the laboratory-formulated liposomes increased as the ratio of cationic:neutral lipid was increased. The amount of plasmid bound to the formulated liposomes was not affected by the type of neutral lipid used. On average, in terms of copy numbers, binding with pCMV-CAT was 1.38-fold higher than pRcCMV-p53. However, microspheres bound 1.7-fold more copy numbers of liposomal-complexed-pRcCMV-p53 plasmid compared to complexed pCMV-CAT. In the release studies, even in the terminal wash, at least 6 x 10 8 copies of complexed plasmids were released, with additional plasmids being held in reserve. Examination of the applicability of such a combination vehicle for in vivo gene targeting to solid tumors is warranted.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.