Abstract
Experts usually express their uncertainty by words of natural languages (like "perhaps", "for sure", etc). In the majority of expert systems and intelligent control systems, uncertainty of experts' statements is represented by a number from the interval [0, 1]. There are many different procedures that translate the words that experts use into numbers from [0, 1]. For one and the same word, different procedures can lead to different numbers. Some &– and ∨–operations are very sensitive to this difference in the sense that small changes in t(A) and t(B) can lead to absolutely different estimates for t(A&B) and t(A ∨ B). In view of that, it is reasonable to restrict ourselves to the operations that are the least sensitive to such changes. In this paper, we prove that ab and a + b − ab are "in the average" the least sensitive &– and ∨–operations. This result is in good accordance with the experimental data according to which in. many cases, these operations provide the best description of how experts actually think. We also show how this idea can be applied to other logical connectives (e.g., "not"), and to the choice of membership functions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.