Abstract
The article pretends to investigate to what extent the judicial decisions within the sphere of Brazilian constitutional jurisdiction communicate with the policy, mainly with a view to the phenomenon of the judicialization of policy in the search was a corrective moral. Thus, the essay begins by investigating the relationship between law and policy, going through the study of judicial activism – notably to the need for a corrective moral of/in law – and, finally, it arrives in the investigation of the Brazilian constitutional jurisdiction inserted in the scenario approached by the previous chapters, showing votes in recent decisions in the STF that corroborate the ideas raised during the research. In the end, it was possible to understand that the activist judicial posture can be understood as an absolutely arbitrary action by the interpreter, linked to politics, – because it is based on an idea of corrective moral – making the constitutional judicial decisions closely linked to the political agendas that end up disfiguring the law.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.