Abstract
From unsupervised to supervised learning a fault detection model (for robots).Insights to why and when it becomes more accurate.Theoretical analysis and a prediction tool.Empirical results on 3 real-world domains that back these insights. The use of robots in our daily lives is increasing. As we rely more on robots, thus it becomes more important for us that the robots will continue on with their mission successfully. Unfortunately, these sophisticated, and sometimes very expensive, machines are susceptible to different kinds of faults. It becomes important to apply a Fault Detection (FD) mechanism which is suitable for the domain of robots. Two important requirements of such a mechanism are: high accuracy and low computational-load during operation (online). Supervised learning can potentially produce very accurate FD models, and if the learning takes place offline then the online computational-load can be reduced. Yet, the domain of robots is characterized with the absence of labeled data (e.g., faulty, normal) required by supervised approaches, and consequently, unsupervised approaches are being used. In this paper we propose a hybrid approach - an unsupervised approach can label a data set, with a low degree of inaccuracy, and then the labeled data set is used offline by a supervised approach to produce an online FD model. Now, we are faced with a choice should we use the unsupervised or the hybrid fault detector? Seemingly, there is no way to validate the choice due to the absence of (a priori) labeled data. In this paper we give an insight to why, and a tool to predict when, the hybrid approach is more accurate. In particular, the main impacts of our work are (1) we theoretically analyze the conditions under which the hybrid approach is expected to be more accurate. (2) Our theoretical findings are backed with empirical analysis. We use data sets of three different robotic domains: a high fidelity flight simulator, a laboratory robot, and a commercial Unmanned Arial Vehicle (UAV). (3) We analyze how different unsupervised FD approaches are improved by the hybrid technique and (4) how well this improvement fits our prediction tool. The significance of the hybrid approach and the prediction tool is the potential benefit to expert and intelligent systems in which labeled data is absent or expensive to create.
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Unsupervised Approaches
Labeled Data Set
High Fidelity Flight Simulator
Unmanned Arial Vehicle
Hybrid Approach
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
May 5, 2014
Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering
Apr 5, 2023
Energy and Buildings
Dec 1, 2020
Sep 1, 2018
Sensors
Mar 22, 2021
International Journal of Refrigeration
Dec 1, 2022
IEEE Access
Jan 1, 2021
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Sep 1, 2022
IEEE Sensors Journal
Jan 1, 2020
Applied Sciences
Aug 30, 2021
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
Oct 24, 2022
Machines
Jun 28, 2022
Expert Systems with Applications
Expert Systems with Applications
Nov 1, 2023
Expert Systems with Applications
Nov 1, 2023
Expert Systems with Applications
Nov 1, 2023
Expert Systems with Applications
Nov 1, 2023
Expert Systems with Applications
Nov 1, 2023
Expert Systems with Applications
Nov 1, 2023
Expert Systems with Applications
Nov 1, 2023
Expert Systems with Applications
Nov 1, 2023
Expert Systems with Applications
Nov 1, 2023
Expert Systems with Applications
Nov 1, 2023