Abstract

Managing multiple currencies, changing money, keeping track of exchange rates, and understanding the ins and out of different bills and coins is a huge burden! While it seems quite rational to combine currencies, it is difficult to do so. Monetary unions involve a trade-off between the expansion of markets and the loss of monetary adjustment as a policy tool. While economic theory suggests that “optimum currency areas,” that is, economic areas with roughly the same levels of wages and economic output, should share currencies, such areas virtually never exist, even within nations that already share currencies. In practice, then, sociological explanations, pointing to the importance of cultural, political, and social institutions for monetary unions, are often more useful than economic ones. These economic and social institutions together create monetary regions. In this chapter, we show how the history of multinational European monetary unions (the Latin Monetary Union, the German Monetary Union, the Scandinavian Monetary Union, the Austro-Hungarian Monetary Union, and the European Monetary Union) illustrates interplay among economic, cultural, political, and social institutions.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.