Abstract
No tillage (NT) is often presented as a means to grow crops with positive environmental externalities, such as enhanced carbon sequestration, improved soil quality, reduced soil erosion, and increased biodiversity. However, whether NT systems are as productive as those relying on conventional tillage (CT) is a controversial issue, fraught by a high variability over time and space. Here, we expand existing datasets to include the results of the most recent field experiments, and we produce a global dataset comparing the crop yields obtained under CT and NT systems. In addition to crop yield, our dataset also reports information on crop growing season, management practices, soil characteristics and key climate parameters throughout the experimental year. The final dataset contains 4403 paired yield observations between 1980 and 2017 for eight major staple crops in 50 countries. This dataset can help to gain insight into the main drivers explaining the variability of the productivity of NT and the consequence of its adoption on crop yields.
Highlights
Background & SummaryOften featured among promising climate change mitigation measures, No tillage (NT) systems, including conservation agriculture (CA), contribute to environmental preservation and sustainable agricultural production[1,2]
Besides soil characteristics and information on management practices, we report a large range of climate variables derived from several external databases
After these screening and selection steps, all relevant data were manually extracted from the selected papers, including general information about the paper, location and year of the experiment, the number of years under NT when the crop was sown, soil characteristics, crop growing season, crop type, crop management practices and crop yield of conventional tillage (CT) and NT
Summary
Background & SummaryOften featured among promising climate change mitigation measures, NT systems, including conservation agriculture (CA), contribute to environmental preservation and sustainable agricultural production[1,2]. Some of these studies relied on global datasets including results of field experiments comparing NT and CT cropping systems over a large range of soil and climate conditions. These datasets do not include the most recent published experiments, and provide no or limited information on soil characteristics, climate variables, and management practices.
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
No Tillage Systems
Positive Environmental Externalities
Conventional Tillage
No Tillage
Enhanced Carbon Sequestration
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Journal of Production Agriculture
Jul 1, 1999
Agronomy Journal
Jan 1, 2006
Sustainability
Apr 24, 2021
Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science
Dec 6, 2022
Soil and Tillage Research
Mar 1, 2019
Journal of Sustainable Agriculture
Mar 9, 2006
Weed Science
Jun 1, 1992
Soil and Tillage Research
Mar 1, 2008
Agriculture
May 23, 2021
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Sep 1, 2015
Land
Mar 12, 2022
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Jan 1, 2014
Journal of Sustainable Agriculture
Oct 1, 2012
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Jun 1, 2021
Scientific Data
Scientific Data
Nov 25, 2023
Scientific Data
Nov 25, 2023
Scientific Data
Nov 25, 2023
Scientific Data
Nov 25, 2023
Scientific Data
Nov 25, 2023
Scientific Data
Nov 25, 2023
Scientific Data
Nov 25, 2023
Scientific Data
Nov 24, 2023
Scientific Data
Nov 24, 2023
Scientific Data
Nov 24, 2023