Abstract

It is commonly reported that the limited availability of material types is a major barrier to widespread adoption for polymer laser powder bed fusion (PBF/L) additive manufacturing (AM). A deeper understanding of the physico-chemical relationships between AM process stimuli and polymer responsive behavior is needed to make data-driven decisions for PBF/L specific material development and formulation. Many researchers have cumulatively built the current state of PBF/L “science-based manufacturing” framework where an initial guess for process parameter values can be determined from measured polymer properties and the first-principles of physics. However, published literature has focused on developing this framework for thermoplastic processing of polymers omitting many specific concerns unique to processing thermosetting materials. The authors consider in the present work the implications of many specific aspects unique to thermosetting polymers during PBF/L manufacturing. These aspects are contextually discussed according to the five sub-functions of PBF/L and are described mathematically where appropriate alongside example data from thermosetting materials commercially available in powder form. This expansion of the prevailing material development framework to include thermosetting polymers paves the way for the unique performance properties offered by that class to be manifest through AM’s geometric freedom.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.