Abstract
Held et al. (1979) Vision Res. 19, 1377–1379, reported that infants' psychometric functions in preferential looking experiments exhibit a region of below chance performance or “negative preference”. They argued from this that previous preferential looking experiments may have systematically underestimated acuity because they ignored this negative preference. We present data from an experiment designed to reveal negative preference in the version of the preferential looking paradigm used in our laboratory. The results do not exhibit negative preference apart from random variations about 50%. Gwiazda et al. (1980) Am. J. Optom. physiol. Opt. 57, 420–427; 428–432, developed a psychophysical procedure for infant testing that is designed to yield accurate threshold estimates in a short period of time. We present the results of computer simulations of more conventional psychophysical procedures. The simulations demonstrate that an up-down staircase procedure is more efficient than the Gwiazda et al. procedure.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
